• WarmSoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      If you want a couple hours of good natured fun it’s worth it. It’s a movie I’m glad I watched.

      Edit: the jokes in it are so stupid you have to laugh with them. Like they knew how dumb they are and they play it perfectly.

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      11 months ago

      Dude, it so fun. It plays like both a movie, and a bunch of players playing the adventure. I’m agoraphobic, and I went to the theater to see it, and I didn’t regret it. That may not seem like much, but I rarely go to the movies because I almost always regret it, even if the movie is good.

      I’ve seen it a half dozen times now :)

      • Lesrid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That’s something I couldn’t quite put my finger on. The movie isn’t overtly meta but it has a meta feeling about it. Like at times you can begin to profile the “players” of these characters. Really captured the spirit of a lighthearted evening session complete with a seasoned DM (even though there is no DM character in the movie) that makes you feel your own feelings when you might have least expected it.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          11 months ago

          I loved how some of the characters are common subversions of expectations, but in believable ways done very well.

          The bard wasn’t horny per the stereotype, he just wanted his wife back.

          The barbarian was a barbarian in combat, but calm and collected when discussing her personal shortcomings with her ex.

          On top of that the major threat was still localized even though it was part of a larger threat.

          Just really got the feeling right of a campaign.

        • Susaga@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          11 months ago

          Just for fun, I wanna put forward my ideas of each player.

          Edgin is always coming up with shenanigans, to the point you forget how seriously he takes his backstory.

          Holga is absolutely the kind of player who plays a Barbarian. Snacking during play, letting the bard play the face, only kinda following along when people discuss magic but still with a clear place in the world.

          Doric is the new player. She picked a tiefling druid cause it seemed fun and magical, and said “can I turn into an owlbear?” in her first session, so the DM obviously said yes.

          Simon is the one who invited Doric because he has a crush on her. He tries to flirt with her irl by flirting in the game.

          I would argue that the group used to have a different DM, and Forge was the PC of the player who took over the DM’s chair.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s on Prime atm.

        I wanted to watch Invincible legit but, uh, it’s not out yet. At least I kind of got my money’s worth from this and Good Omens.

        • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Did you see the Atom Eve feature? That’s a thing to tide us over, although I haven’t gotten around to watching it yet myself.

        • sammytheman666@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          Nah, I just stand there and admire the cinematography. If you’re gonna fuck up the rules, then make it enjoyable. Aka, the rule of cool, but represented by a talented artist.

      • Rhaedas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s amazing for the depth and detail it delivers as a D&D movie. It’s certainly no LotR, but it doesn’t pretend to be either and definitely doesn’t take itself seriously (plenty of examples of subtle 4th wall breaks). I found I enjoyed it even more the second time around after reading what D&D players had to say (mostly positive) and seeing the details I missed that they caught.

      • Lesrid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        Avoiding spoilers I’ll give it my highest praise for how they handled the character relationships. You could argue the movie is action/adventure slop but it handles the characters quite well.

      • Piecemakers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        “Not amazing”? Have you even seen any other D&D movie ever made? They’re mud-caked shitbricks to this flick. Comparing it to any other film is right up there with expecting a fish to climb a tree. 🤌🏼

        • Aielman15@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          You don’t have to compare movies to other entries in the same franchise. Just the same genre is enough.

          Like, Resident Evil movies suck. A lot. I don’t have to pick one and say “The others are worse, so this must be good”. I can confidently say that “this is the better one, but it still sucks”.

          As for the DnD movie, I was honestly disappointed, especially as I went to watch it after hearing the very positive online discourse about it, which elevated my expectations a bit.

          • Piecemakers@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I swear, if you’re one of those still gargling Peter Jackson’s kiwi fruits… 🤦🏼‍♂️

            • Aielman15@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              I don’t have the slightest idea of what the meaning of those words is, but “gargling Peter Jackson’s kiwi fruit” might be the funniest insult I’ve ever received.

              Actually, no, scratch that. I was called an “inverted can of shoe polish” once on Reddit. That’s still the funniest. You take the second spot, though.