• 87Six@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    6 months ago

    Why can’t the EU just play the Valve card, and just do nothing and win? Fucking do nothing rather than this shit.

  • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    If kids are using VPNs, most of the time it will be because their parents made that decision for them; most aren’t using their parents’ credit cards to buy a VPN subscription to bypass blocks without their parents knowing. Age verification advocates argue that it puts more control in the hands of parents, but in the case of VPNs, taking that control away goes entirely against that argument.

    It’s not about giving parents control, or ultimately even about kids at all; people want to impose their personal morals on all of society via governmental enforcement mechanisms. Social media platforms are promoting it because age verification is beneficial to them as a legally-mandated anti-bot mechanism, increasing their advertising revenue by guaranteeing user suitability for advertisers.

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Age verification is beneficial to social media because they get their grasping hands on our personal information. They allow bots on their platforms, they only take down the ones the government and the oligarchy tell them to.

  • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    The European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS) has warned that virtual private networks (VPNs) are increasingly being used to bypass online age-verification systems, describing the trend as “a loophole in the legislation that needs closing.”

    So a warning about just that. So the EU did not and neither did EPRS warn, they did in fact not call VPNs a loophole that needs closing, which would include any VPN.

    That said, watch out for slippery slopes!

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t see how this could be easily enforced if every website uses encryption. Once it’s encrypted it’s pretty much impossible for anyone to identify what’s what.

    • eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      You should talk to the people in Russia right now. They could tell you a thing, or two about VPN blockage, and traffic filtering.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      You’t see how what could be easily enforced?

      HTTPS and VPN have very little to do with each other. The source and target of the communications are still quite clear that you can see that the source and destination are the VPN instead of an end user.

      From a large corporate website or a network provider standpoint VPNs stick out like a sore thumb. Hell, we can detect tor and I2P nodes, and those actually, take work to differentiate.