

The idea is that privacy laws in the EU arguably normally make it illegal for messaging providers to even voluntarily scan messages for illegal activity (including child pornography). What’s being proposed is an exemption to that so that they can scan voluntarily.
That is no longer in the realm of governments trying to oppress us, we are now talking about business regulation. It would not prohibit anyone from running their own messaging server or running any software on their own device.
In any case, the IPA above doesn’t seem “unpronounceable” at all to me as a native speaker of German and fluent speaker of English. The pronunciation isn’t intuitive from the spelling, that is quite a different thing from being unpronounceable.
I don’t use one except for work (to connect to corporate networks).
A VPN mostly changes which entity you have to trust (from your ISP to your VPN provider). I don’t have a reason to distrust my ISP any more than any VPN provider. I don’t have any need to regularly get around any geoblocking.
When I do privacy-sensitive things, I use Tor, which is actually effective at hiding who I am and what I am doing.


Do you have a link to a source for this?


to be clear, I obviously think the campaign against chat control is a very good and very necessary thing; I shared the article because I found the campaign methods interesting and also wanted to draw more attention to what’s going on, not because I agree with all of its framing (although I understood the “spam” in the headline to be tongue-in-cheek, maybe not everyone did though?).


which is not end-to-end encrypted either


Notepad: Notepad++ or Visual Studio Code. Or if you like terminal windows: https://github.com/microsoft/edit
Paint: https://www.pinta-project.com/ seems to have Windows builds.
Calculator: https://qalculate.github.io/ is the best I know of.


then I have good news for you: https://linuxiac.com/ladybird-browser-team-selects-swift-as-preferred-language/


I remember reading a post somewhere on the threadiverse that contained a list of all websites one AI crawler was using for training, there were several Lemmy instances on it. It would even be possible to set up an instance only to crawl it.


You might want to post something publicly, but conceal who you are. Tor can help with that.


Much of AI training happens on the entire public web, including here.


also several places at which I’ve worked on business-internal software, including my current job


GitLab, I am not sure if their own installation hits all points (depends on what you define as “big tech involvement” maybe), but if you self-host it, certainly.


Parties choose whom to nominate as ministers.
I’m not a voter in Denmark and not familiar with Danish politics; this kind of thing would certainly cause me to vote for a different party.


apparently nominally a member of a social-democratic party
When I was younger, I believed that social-democratic parties were better than conservative ones on matters of civil liberties. I stand corrected on that.


I notice there is no mention of a license, so this is not actually open source.


Is there a translation of https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence into Nepali yet, I wonder.


Yeah I mean why would you let young people have fun or anything like that? If they are constantly bored, they will certainly be happier. Or something…


yup, that is why (if memory serves) the chat control proposal has rules in it that look like they were specifically written for messengers, the authors seem to have no clue that encryption can, you know, just be run on any device using publicly available algorithms…
Reforming the GDPR is in principle a good idea because many of the terms used in it are so vague that it’s completely unclear what it does or doesn’t mean.
Somehow I suspect that improving this isn’t what’s going to happen…