True in general, but there’s no reason why voting should be one of those things.

the enemy is both weak and strong

There are wikis specifically for travel guides too, e.g. Wikivoyage, Wikitravel.

maybe Wikibooks? Not very familiar with what they accept or not.

Marseille

I prefer this distinction: https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/moderation-is-different-from-censorship

However, that comes with some extra requirements, such as having 85% of the partners be from Spain, a limitation that Igalia did not want.

How does that comply with EU law? Is not most discrimination between citizens of different EU member states prohibited by it?

Different pieces of legislation. This was about the French legislature voting against a national anti-encryption bill. Chat control is an EU-level bill and the French legislature isn’t really involved in that, only the French government and France’s EU representatives.

If It Can’t Steal All Your Copyrighted Work

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Copying_Is_Not_Theft.webm

Have you looked into Matrix?

Agree with the main point, though disagree that FOSS is “boycotting capitalism”, many for-profit companies contribute to FOSS and FOSS can be used by for-profit companies too, much of today’s capitalism runs on FOSS.

The point of free software is that it does not have owners, so what exactly are you “boycotting”?

You want to switch from a free and open source browser to a proprietary browser and think this will improve your privacy?

I don’t think there are any viable engines other than the three you mention. Other browsers than the three you mention are viable, I am typing this in LibreWolf, but they are all based on one of these three engines.

I recently tried Ladybird and it crashes e.g. when I try to access my Lemmy instance. Definitely not viable yet in 2025, but this doesn’t mean it must remain so.

I’ve been using Ghost Commander for years and it does everything I need, although I don’t have your specific requirements so you need to check that yourself.

You think you’re the first person to have this bad idea? This https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/programs-must-not-limit-freedom-to-run.html was written in 2012 and I suggest you read it before posting anything here again.

@schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de calls to end premiership of Pedro Sanchez

Yes, but that is less likely if they have been deleted very soon after creation.

Yeah but instances are supposed to e.g. delete posts when the user deletes them. A malicious instance might not do that. Even without malice, I know this doesn’t always work because some weeks ago, I deleted a comment almost immediately after saving it, then kept getting upvotes for it; I found out this was because (at least) one very popular instance hadn’t deleted that comment, its users were still seeing it and upvoting it.

I think you can even do it in Organic Maps itself? In OsmAnd definitely.

OpenStreetMap data is exactly as good as volunteers made it.

I participated in a discussion similar to this recently here on the German-language community: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/28281369/15510510

Topics that were raised there by various people, some by me (read the full discussion if you can read German):

• an “algorithm” is really just a way of manipulating data, it’s meaningless to say you are banning “algorithms” because all software is based on “algorithms”, even reverse-chronological sorting of things you’re subscribed to is an algorithm
• algorithms are mainly intended to keep people on the platform for as long as possible (but I raised the issue that I actually found old web forums more engaging than today’s Facebook)
• how do you define “an algorithm” legally? I suggested a definition based on transparency and objectivity, others raised the issue that this would mean that misinformation could be easily manipulated to be shown at the top, and that if you require “transparency”, the platforms will just disclose how their algorithms work instead of abolishing them

One important aspect that nobody raised in that discussion is that moderation is different from censorship.