To be clear, that was just an expression of frustrated cynicism rather than a warning of any actual policy change. Also, it’s law enforcement in Spain and France that have actually been doing stuff like that so far; I just wouldn’t be surprised if US cops jumped on the bandwagon.

Can’t blame you for wanting to stay away from the US, though!

GrapheneOS about to become illegal/probable cause for a terrorism charge. The goal is to criminalize everyone who opposes MAGA tyranny.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_farm but with porn on it.

Thanks!

guess I need to look at bit for “how to stuff a huge graphics card into a mini box”.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8X2Y62JGDCo

(That’s only the latest in a whole series of videos of his on that topic.)

Lots of unreasonable devs out there.

Can’t do that anymore with the new ones, AFAIK.

Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears!

Do you need a specific game mechanic for that? Surrender, being a type of talking, is a free action.

Admittedly I haven’t used Omada even though my gear supported it (before I flashed OpenWRT on it), but I don’t think it bears any resemblance to Ansible except in the most basic sense of being able to accomplish administrative tasks somehow.

What I was expecting was something that would provide a web dashboard showing all of my OpenWRT (and ideally, misc. other devices) at once, maybe with a nice diagram of the network topology and stuff like that.

Does there exist something more appropriate?

EDIT: I talked with a guy and totally forgot an important point, does reflashing the hardware prevent me from using features with the vendors i listed? I know companies can suck

If they’re software features and OpenWRT doesn’t implement them, yes. That’s not really the fault of the hardware manufacturer, though; that’s just a tradeoff you’ve chosen to make.

For example, I’m pretty sure you won’t be able to use Ubiquiti’s UniFi or TP-Link’s Omada software-defined networking to manage your OpenWRT-flashed device, but that’s just because OpenWRT hasn’t implemented it, not because installing it trips some kind of DRM fuse or whatever.

(I think OpenWISP might be the OpenWRT-compatible Free Software equivalent for that sort of thing, but I have yet to look into it myself so I’m not sure.)

Otherwise, I haven’t personally heard of any vendors intentionally sabotaging their hardware such that it disables itself when flashed with OpenWRT, but that’s not the same as an affirmative statement that it can’t ever happen.

Everything’s an outdoor activity if you’re exhibitionist enough! ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Edit: oh wait, you meant genealogy research.

I know youre going to hate me, but Dan Rather posted my nudes on instagram

It’s not just the result I take issue with; it’s the implementation. They’re claiming that everything in the city is controlled by an HOA, up to and including the roads, and yet it’s “private” and somehow not a government in all but name? Ridiculous, and worse, antidemocratic!

The existence of that city is fucking outrageous.

I have a domain, but all I use it for so far is email (with an email provider, not my own mail server, hosted locally or otherwise). I’d still call that “usable,” though.

If this shit is what “ahead” looks like, I’m happy being “behind.”

Like when you run apt install some-package who says that some-package doesn’t contain malware?

The Debian (or Ubuntu) package maintainer says that. Having an application package available in a distro’s official repository is an endorsement of the safety of that package.

This is something people need to appreciate before they go adding PPAs and flatpaks and whatnot willy-nilly.

Yep, do it.

(Posted from a Pixel 7 running GrapheneOS)