I just posted an article explaining the study to the ‘You Should Know’ community, so hopefully some of the people who need to see it do so
I just posted an article explaining the study to the ‘You Should Know’ community, so hopefully some of the people who need to see it do so
There have been studies which found playing tetris for an hour or two after seeing something traumatic can prevent it taking root in our longterm memory.
I tried it once after accidentally clicking a link on reddit that turned out to be gore, I can’t remember exactly what it was now (about 9 months later) so it must have worked
Slight tangent, but autocorrect seems to have gotten terrible the last year or so. My theory: as more and more people are using it, the initial dataset is being diluted by more and more bad typers. Instead of improving the dataset, it’s pulling it in so many different directions that it doesn’t know which way is up anymore
Build it and they will come edit someone already did!
lemmy.world/c/BrandNewSentence
I wonder, could this problem be solved by adding some ‘junk’ data to each access request? With that junk data being a unique identifier, so the authorities can setup a sting to catch whoever is selling access
In Austria and Germany (as far as I’m aware, I’m not a lawyer) when it’s criminal charges the state sues
To follow on from my previous comment… I’m sure you’ve seen multiple cases in your own country where the police / courts decline to charge or prosecute someone based on lack of physical evidence
She will almost certainly find it very, very hard to prove the offence. Police and courts are usually reluctant to prosecute something on a ‘he said, she said’ basis. I can see why she’d not go down the police route with that, without even taking into account the massive power imbalance in terms of wealth / influence
Sounds like a job for Vicious Mockery. Call in the bard!