CEO had a weird remark about a usa republican politician, people didn’t like to find out that some of their devs use AI coding assistants and then they attempted (and failed spectacularly) to remove its traces from their github repositories, and many don’t like that they launched a free LLM service.

I don’t know if I agree with the first one. I don’t know what to make of it, there is contradictory information about it on the internet, but I certainly keep that in mind.
I don’t care that much about the copilot configs in the repo, because I think it can be used kind of responsibility (relatively to the environment, not, though), but it’s extremely suspicious how they handled it.
the third is something I don’t agree with completely either. are we also hating duckduckgo for having duck.ai , or is it only proton? people say marketing it as encrypted is a scam. sure the queries cannot be end to end encrypted, but the storage of former chats can. did they market it as an E2EE service, without specifying which part is like that?