CSS scroll drive animation (standard), Cross document view transitions (standard), CSS corner shape, Multicol Level 2 (standard), some of the Filesystem Access API, WebGPU on linux, PWA manifest install (standard), took 3 years to ship documentPictureInPicture.

half of these are animations. are you choosing your browser by what cool animations it supports?

certain things are better unimplemented. like webusb and complete filesystem access, because they are too dangerous features to give to random websites by a single click. if a website wants to access arbitrary parts of my filesystem they should develop a downloadable app for that.

webgpu and pwa support are indeed happening slowly. Unfortunately firefox does not have as much funds as our favorite advertising supergiant does, and they are just the same plagued by a CEO who can’t ever be fulfilled with enough of a paycheck. you will not fix that by switching to chrome.

document picture in picture kind of sounds WTF, like the other feature allowing arbitrary HTML to he rendered onto a canvas. I feel it more with the latter, but sometimes I just feel google is intentionally making the web a standard too heavy to have competitors.

Web standard are implemented first in chromium, then in firefox after years.

I just addressed this in the previous sentence.

Chromium based browser have strict multiprocess isolation. This is not true for firefox. If a tab crashes chrome it does not crash the entire browser. This is only partially true for firefox

how is that only partially true on firefox? this is exactly the reason why it consumes so much memory when having lots of websites open.
I do not remember the last time firefox crashed for me. must have been many years ago.

Chromium is an objectively slightly better browser on paper than Firefox.

only if you completely ignore a bunch of aspects of it. in reality, it has a few advantages and lots of disadvantages. oh, and its also the default for billions of people who have no clue why choose one over the other.

better support for nonstandard web technologies

fixed that for you

more stable

what?

and better performance

yes it is a known fact that google sites including youtube are engineered to be slower on firefox.

One example qould be monero crypto currency that is more private and more anonymous than cash.

did they fix the small ring size already? it was a big topic last year. if they haven’t, then no its not more private than cash, because it has a public record of the transaction where the real sender is hiding between a dozen or two decoy senders. with cash there is nothing like that.

I think Implementation of privacy would be comparable to cash transactions.

exchange of non-electronic physical items will always be more private than trusting a blackbox machine (any computer) running whatever payment standard accepted in the local economic area. with a good standard that could be acceptable, but the point stands.

About it being offline: If you have a transaction I signed with my private key for example over NFC you do not need it to be online at all. You can always prove I paid you.

double spend prevention requires one party to be online.

How does that make sense? Google is also maga.

that’s not how most people think about google, and so it could be used (even by google) to smear competitors with being pro-maga. it matters more for the users of the competitor than it does for the users of google.

to be honest it’s hard to describe this overexplained apology that LLMs give. I regularly use claude through duck.ai, and I have to agree with him, the writing style and words used is way too familiar.

deleted by creator

their marketing practices have been questionable for years, though. the promotional emails (everyone subscribed by default) and even the pricing pages are filled with dark patterns. by the charity fundraisers they do, these dark patterns don’t seem to be necessary for their sustainability.

In my opinion, in these two metrics Proton very noticeably falls behind most of their competition. That’s why I wouldn’t use it for security or privacy.

what facts do you base your opinion on?

more private than cash, that is not possible. also I don’t see how could it work fully offline

also in the EU. but it’s hard, there are already countries that are practically cashless

Why are a multitude of poor options better than a few good options?

because you see it wrong. it is not poor just because it is not shiny polished perfect. it is still an improvement over the factory rom, and if the maintainer is trustworthy then it’s an improvement over lineage os too.

Features removed

USB protection — the low-level USB port controls rely on Pixel-specific hardware and are non-functional on other devices

they don’t need to outright remove that. I know that at least some fairphone models are capable of that, because another ROM makes use of it. it seems it was more important to have a much broader compatibility quickly, without testing what features do really need to be removed for what devices. there are probably other removed features too where tbis applies

but this is not all that graphene gives, I believe this does not make it worthless. they have other unique features too like sandboxed google play and the possibility to manage sensor access for apps separately, and more.

Anonymity - whether or not someone can see what’s behind your door.

that’s also privacy. anonimity is whether the neighbors know who lives in your house

and what about QR code login? I think MAS is required for that

I mean… I don’t disagree but you’re arguing against somebody who is not here.

I thought it was obvious. I was arguing with you, because it seemed you were sympathizing with the user that regularly deletes their post. I was arguing that the reasons given are not good reasons. also this is not a DM, others are reading it too. evidence is you got a downvote on this comment, and it was not me. and most people lurking rarely vote.

a) Say they’re stupid and change nothing and continue to bitch about the problem or

why, what can I change?

apparently it was already fixed a year or two ago in a yet unreleased version of lemmy. so it seems a software change will not help in a reasonable amount of time.

b) Understand why they’re doing what they do and try to address it.

tried, and it makes not much sense to me. nobody is receiving live notifications from lemmy, or if they do, that’s because they use a niche client where they didn’t turn them off.

but also… starting a discussion and then not wanting to participate, so dropping a bomb… that makes no sense.

could be, I think when deleting your account there is a checkbox whether to delete all your posts abd comments

Actually @clif@lemmy.world was right here, the abbreviation is antilock braking system

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-lock_braking_system

but it seems this is the thing that does emergency braking too nowadays.

I think it could still be bots. like an automated campaign to make tensions in the fedi communities. probably unlikely though.

Somebody may want an answer and once they get it don’t want the other replies to keep notifying them.

• the first answer is often not the best one
• don’t take away the discussion from others

But it’s remarkable that all the lemmykins arguing with me and down-voting me simply can’t see things from another person’s pov.

I’m sure we can see that point of view, we just refuse it because it’s such a mean pov

normal procedure? where exactly have you seen that be done? for that every user would have to register a developer account and fumble with an API key