Not a surprise but man

  • RacoonVegetable@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I hate google as much as the next guy but this seems like just a bunch of minor incidents not worth reporting instead of a major coverup (like imo the title of the article implies).

    • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Mmmm…. I think the title may be a bit strongly worded, but the concept that a big data company like Google isn’t doing what you expect them to be doing with your data…. Despite clear efforts to do so… that’s kind of concerning.

      Like it’s cool that they have this DB and that things like this are getting fixed, it might be nice if they were more transparent about this… but it seems like they’re trying. And yet, so many privacy issues crop up due to the shear quantity and variety of data they process.

      • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s a fine line. If they’re working on them reporting the issue before it’s resolved increases the risk somebody can use this as a kind of todo list of social and technical engineering weakpoints to get at other user data.

    • akwd169@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t fully agree with you. It’s certainly no major coverup but it’s a heap of evidence that goes against this shiny veneer google maintains with the public

      Google pretends they are champions of user privacy and protection to maintain trust and enable data collection on an unprecedented scale

      When this article shows they are actually leaking private info left right and center, have the most nonchalant attitude towards respecting and maintaining our privacy and evidently ‘keeping private info safe’ (or should I say ‘not being evil’) is at the bottom of their priority list

      • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I thought they got rid of that from the list altogether when they realized they couldn’t not be evil while simultaneously maximizing profits

        • realbadat@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not really. It’s gone from the alphabet handbook, not Google’s.

          Which was a hilarious bit for me recently with a guy saying “I HAVE THE HANDBOK FOR GOOGLE” and getting all upset despite my repeatedly pointing out that it was removed for alphabet, which is a different company.

          It also got moved around in the Google handbook a bit. Still exists though.

      • morrowind@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah or basically all data is a risk, no matter how private the company claims to be

    • Canary9341@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      bunch of minor incidents not worth reporting

      That the personal data of millions of people are leaked is newsworthy, even more so if it was hidden from the victims.

    • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Or just the tip of the iceberg of a larger, more systemic problem within the organization. Wild your default position is to assume Google is doing all the right things when we have a long history of the company being shady af and lying about it.