ohh, thats why i got all these downvotes. youre right, i was trying to deny the original claim that trees would ruin any infrastructure we build around them. so, yes, was just saying that some infrastructure can be made compatible with trees, while most implemented infra is not.

trees dont ruin ANY human infrastructure. But the usual urban infrastructure isnt well thought out enough to exist around trees. But smarter urbanism is possible and in fact does exist.

every google site has been doing this for years too. every comment we write in youtube and discard before posting, its being recorded. this isnt news at all.

i see

oh, you meant that since russians cannot contribute, then they’re not going to work with american companies that want to have their firmwares supported by the kernel.

ah ok

cant you still get info on that firmware by just reading the kernel source code? how does contributing code get you info?

what do you mean by “export controls”? backdoors?

the article mentions that the tool takes into consideration architecture, distance between buildings and so on. i think youd have to mess up the backgrounds somehow

i would guess that people that deactivate js are fine not using google for search