• 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle

  • This is entirely speculation on your part.

    Google has been more transparent that it happens. Apple is definitely collecting information on everything you do on their devices as well. It may be just as much info.

    With their new pay later feature, you know they are at least collecting enough info to make financial decisions based on your profile.

    They also collect health data using the watch.

    They collect more than that in order to better understand how to keep people in their ecosystem. I’d wager the latter will about cover what OP was surprised by Google capturing.

    Microsoft is another story. They are the most valuable tech company in the world right now due to AI. Which indicates that they are training some powerful AI on data that has been gathered in a number of places.





  • I will say that Apple is 100 percent collecting your data. Health, financial, biometric, anything you put in an Apple Device is subject. Like most large companies, the are probably also purchasing profile data from Acxiom and Experian.

    I don’t know if they are doing it with this service but Apple is definitely not respecting your privacy. If you are concerned about privacy, you’re better off trying to use more specialized tools for a job than any singular ecosystem. Apple wants everybody to be in their single ecosystem to better build profiles in their systems.





  • ursakhiin@beehaw.orgtoPrivacy@lemmy.mlPrivacy = no free speech
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t think USA today or any other outlet should be protected. I do think the reporters that work there should be protected.

    Corporations should be held accountable for what they say or “strongly encourage” others to say. Individuals should be protected if they get things wrong, though.



  • Why isn’t purchasing the part through Apple enough?

    And also Is the consumer not allowed to assume the risk of going through after market repair that you seem to be concerned about?

    This issue has always been about Apple trying to force older iPhones into obsolescence. They want the freedom to eventually say that no more parts exist for that device so you’ll have to upgrade. If repair shops can leverage broken phones to repair other phones, that extends the life of the device part Apples plans.

    Most people will continue using older phones as long as they can because they don’t need the latest phone.