

Yes. The people in control are being very smart about not drawing attention to this or the platforms it’s supposed to be addressing.
Yes. The people in control are being very smart about not drawing attention to this or the platforms it’s supposed to be addressing.
It’s fascinating you don’t believe that authorities are frustrated by people sharing CP without repercussions.
In this specific case, there’s a legitimate argument to be made for protecting kids even if you don’t think it’s worth the increased surveillance.
I’m kidding by the way about it being fascinating. It’s actually really stupid and doesn’t surprise me that people like you would believe nonsense.
The real reason for this is because pedophiles have been getting away with sharing CP and there’s literally nothing the authorities can do about it.
If we want privacy, we have to accept that it will be abused by some people for nefarious purposes.
Don’t get me wrong, governments always want more surveillance of their populations. It’s just in this specific case, they are trying to force it as much as possible because they can’t tolerate people sharing CP without repercussion.
We still have Matrix.
Opening ports essentially allows other computers on the internet to initiate a connection with yours.
It’s only dangerous if a service running on those ports can be exploited.
Ignored.