I’m aware, that’s why I specifically phrased it as a consideration and not, like, “wow, those people are dumb and should switch to Linux immediately!”
Again, if you feel a certain way about my comment and think it said something it didn’t, that’s not on me.
I even said this software is a good thing for people using Windows.
I don’t recall where I said everyone should or can switch. I said they should be considering it. If you’re feeling pressured that’s not on me.
I fully expect a Windows update to break this somehow. Good for this dev though and it’ll be nice to have this software out there. Hopefully they don’t have to fight against Microsoft’s bullshit just to grow a user base.
Anyone who uses this should be considering switching to Linux though. Maybe that’s the dev’s long game. :b
Could also do yt-dlp -S "res:1080" - it works with vertical videos too (will scale using the smallest dimension).
I’m not aware of any Google Docs frontends. But maybe a dummy Google account using a private window with ad-blocking and tracker-blocking enabled would work?
Gotta love some shit icing on the shit cake.
So do you use some kind of payment app that does a conversion or do you have to manually convert from Monero to fiat currency?
Most retailers don’t accept crypto at the point of purchase so I’m curious as to how this would be convenient enough to use regularly.
Sucks to live in Spain, I guess. The rest of us get spied on just fine without it being nearly as annoying. /s
I’m not sure why this is the focus rather than legislating that router/access point manufacturers create robust and simple to use parental controls and then running public service campaigns that educate parents on how to use them.
Not that I really care that much since I don’t watch porn. I just don’t think putting adult content behind a verification system that applies to everyone makes sense when the idea is to prevent kids, who generally have at least one person who controls the networking equipment and should be monitoring their devices/activity, from seeing it.
Yeah, I could never get NPM to work right on my system either. I use the NGINX Docker image and set up my certs manually.
If I were to do it all over again today, I would probably go with Caddy since it now has a bunch of that stuff built in with automatic HTTPS by default and the basic reverse proxy setup is literally 2 lines of code.
You could try Logseq, it’s like Obsidian but open source. I use Obsidian for most notes and I also have a personal wiki built with Otterwiki.
I use NGINX for my reverse proxy, you could check out NGINX Proxy Manager which uses Certbot to automate the SSL certificates.
I’ve heard a lot of people also like Caddy and Traefik. Can’t remember which is easier to use, maybe Caddy.
deleted by creator
FWIW, these are effective only when both are used on the same circuit. If you live in an older home, the chances of this being the case are higher.
My entire apartment, except for the washroom, is on the same circuit. It also means I can’t run an air conditioner without tripping the breaker. :|
I use Cockpit to manage my system and containers and Dashy as a browser dashboard. It’s similar to Heimdall but more minimal.
I also run Otterwiki and I’m planning on documenting my setup, but I haven’t got around to it yet.
Then you can’t “hide” your server IP without a VPS/VPN set up. Maybe I’m not understanding what you’re asking? Your public IP is visible to any machine you connect to and that includes Cloudflare’s servers.
Are you worried about copyright or something? This isn’t legal advice, but I doubt they give a shit unless you’re hosting content illegally for a large number of people. Obviously, only take the risk if you are comfortable with the potential consequences where you live.
I’m not really knowledgeable about it, but there is an article from Tailscale that explains how they use SSH (basically it creates a separate SSH server specifically for Tailnet traffic). From what I understand, this feature is relatively new.
You may also want to look into Tailnet lock.
You could try Tailscale? It creates a secure tunnel to your server so you don’t have to connect it to the internet. Not sure if that checks all your boxes though.
So how are you supposed to be able to double-blind a study involving MDMA? It seems essentially impossible, which makes it inevitable that this will always happen at every review, no?
Why is double-blinding so important in this specific instance to the point that it’s best that the buck stops here?
Seems like an easy way to kill momentum of a life-saving mental health treatment because it’s politically inconvenient (and maybe endangers existing pharmaceutical products?).
Hmm, I tried it out after seeing this but I’m not really much of a fan of the mobile-first approach. I’ve moved on to HortusFox and it’s more what I was expecting.
My wife is the one who’ll be using it though, so we’ll see if she likes it.