And now with zero indicator light that it’s recording

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/kylie-jenner-meta-glasses-fascist_n_6a565e74e4b0540b8c7b111a

I’m getting there with the cult of vroom vroom. Like gas isn’t expensive enough they burn it for fun, and our planet is literally cooking.

but sports & religion 100%

yup. would love to see the amount of grunt they’re applying to compute and track all this garbage. it’s an obscene invasion of privacy and local govs love it. fuuuuuuuuu

PRIVACY NO, PROTECTION FROM VOYERISM YES.

https://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.115

STOP MAKING IT SEEM OK TO CREEP ON PEOPLE IT’S ACTUALLY FUCKING ILLEGAL.

You phenomenal dolt, why are you advocating for women and children to be abused you dumb fucking shit

yeah it’s so crazy to care about women and children being creeped upon.

do you even think about what you write?

crybaby creep

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

WELL GOLLY GEE I GUESS THAT FUCKIN ENDS THE DISCUSSION HUH?

No, it doesn’t. https://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.115

See, there’s actually laws about this shit that you “no expectation of privacy” creeps love to ignore. And these tools are making it easier.

Why do you want to make it easier to creep on little girls?

You don’t care. We get it.

Creepers gonna creep.

and you want them to have better equipment to creep with.

they want to hide a camera they can do it in lapel pin or something.

lapel pin cameras are shitty resolution, and you can’t point them at your target by moving your head.

stop acting like it’s not a problem. I’m not scared of having MY photo taken, it’s the upskirts on escalators and creeps peering down blouses, you dolt.

I despise license plate cameras, but that’s an entirely different kind of invasion of privacy and you KNOW this.

I know you’re not concerned by some dude wearing glasses, and I can see you don’t give two fucks about those who are.

if you cared about them you’d care about this. the fact that you immediately jump to legal definitions created in the age of film is absurd; there was never a minox that had 4k video, but that’s what we’re looking at these days. and you don’t seem to care that there’s a booming market to disable the recording lights.

If I were your wife and daughter I’d be creeped out by you.

There is no privacy in public, by definition of those two words.

creep. so quick to carve out the rules by which you and other can invade the privacy of individuals. you know there’s a difference between general photography and this. you know this. I don’t have to explain it to you.

you’re just a creep who wants to creep on women and kids.

there’s already a booming market for disabling the recording light.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/tiktok-sellers-show-how-to-disable-meta-smart-glasses-privacy-light/articleshow/123133545.cms

does that utility outweigh the privacy of the public though?

Shame it’s meta because the answer will always skew towards invading privacy and shitting on the others.

this is the problem with great tech, it can be used for valid purposes like yours, or for nefarious purposes, and the maker doesn’t fuckin care.

if this was a product made by a reputable company I’d say go for it, but considering their wretched history of invasive garbage, I’d hold out for a better take.

(parents) are overworked, underpaid, living in tiny apartments they can barely afford, have to pay more in childcare than rent just to maintain their living situation…

seems like we’re already there

nah.

perhaps, but it’s not that dramatically different - you share hallways, foyers, garages, but generally have control over a few select places - bedrooms, living rooms etc.

obviously this is a concern in some places otherwise why would they have written the article?

lived in apts from 2000-2015 - the ones in texas had their own AC, but elsewhere? Shared heating (steam fed radiators in ny) or large AC units on roofs pumping cold air into multiple units (VA, OR, WA)…