Which is why shit is continuously tested. Guys, billions of dollars goes into this. It’s not hard to find extra data pushed into packets. Far more complex shit is the norm.
- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
That’s the neat part. You don’t. There is an entire industry of devs trying to be the guy who conclusively proved all the companies are actually recording you.
Guys, ten or hundred of thousands security researchers have been going at this for years. Google isn’t secretly listening to you.
These things work with 2 mics, and 2 different circuits. The recording mic is one, while the detection mic is another. The second mic is only capable of pattern matching.
So yeah it’s on but only capable of hashing a 5 second recording and matching it to your voice (this shit works a lot like rsa keys if that’s helpful) to serve as a wake word. Maybe flag a simple response.
All that’s happening is the device heard a loud sound and knows it wasn’t a match or what’s expected.
makeshift0546@lemmy.todayto
Technology@lemmy.ml•Microsoft reports are exposing AI's real cost problem: Using the tech is more expensive than paying human employees
2·20 days agoEven if you take worst case costs Anthropic’s “Profitability” Swindle https://share.google/UV5HNgJyMzfcknekF it’s already approaching profitable.
If you slow down the model update cycle it’s looking like at least anthropic can be profitable 🤷♂️. That argument is loosing it’s weight quickly.
makeshift0546@lemmy.todayto
Technology@lemmy.ml•Microsoft reports are exposing AI's real cost problem: Using the tech is more expensive than paying human employees
5·20 days agoMeh, right now, and only if you’re trying to replace the work force. At is current state, on a $30 a month Copilot plan you’ll already see a huge gain in efficiency with supervised coding and agents doing minor chores and maintenance.
The average coder isn’t better then opus 4.6. No, is not ready to run production code bases unsupervised. Yes, it’s absolutely ready to do many many simple tasks autonomous and more complex coding with supervision.
If you take even a week to try out this shit with an eye for what’s possible currently and have an ounce of common sense, I fail to see how folks don’t realize this will absolutely change how software is delivered. Yes humans will be involved but there will be much much less direct coding and a lot more supervision over multiple concurrent tasks that have had the time to delivery cut significantly.
makeshift0546@lemmy.todayto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•People who are staying on Plex, have you tried Jellyfin? What about it do you not prefer? (real question)English
6·20 days agoThe UI didn’t support remotes on console and use tiles. Really amateur shit. No need to set up a reverse proxy. I have a lifetime, zero need to switch.
makeshift0546@lemmy.todayto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•GitLab Act 2 - A letter to our customers and our investors.English
10·1 month agoI like AI and use it. This post was just sad. What a crazy way to announce you don’t have an AI product while saying your product is dead.

I love how confident y’all are that AI isn’t going to affect your coding and you really think you’ll survive in the industry without adjusting how you work.
Even today, it’s already better than most coders at small specialized scoped tasks.
Use the tools when appropriate. This is such a stupid fucking thing to get your undies in a twist over.
But yeah, I’m sure y’all will lead the fork and put in your own time to own it.