Use an Instagram-specific site container to isolate your activity from your normal browsing. Imo this is really the only thing that matters that doesn’t have to do with your self control. You want to make sure Meta gets nothing from cross-site tracking and containerizing IG should do that. Also, don’t visit links to and from IG. Look it up manually through IG search.

I used to rely heavily on duckdns and it was great for a time, but moved off them a couple of years ago because resolution became inconsistent. I’ve since rolled my own ddns using a script that utilizes Porkbun.com’s DNS record API.

Not to be confused with white-label products in general

Was your old setup using docker volumes? Your old database could be in one

You forgot to include a link to the project:

https://github.com/DeveloperPaul123/modern-cv

This will be of zero help to you if your registrar isn’t Porkbun, but I’ve recently stopped using DuckDNS in lieu of this.

Duckdns has been inconsistent for me as well for the past year. Have you considered alternatives?

I believe the nameservers are what respond to domain resolution requests. Nameservers not responding could mean they are down. If there’s no backup and the domain is resolved using one of those servers, then that might explain it not working.

I believe the UDP ports are for discovery on your local network so no need to handle them with your reverse proxy. If you’ve got them passed through docker your local devices should pick them up.

They’re also not required since you can always just enter the address manually. I don’t bother passing them into my container.

https://github.com/gethomepage/homepage

Another vote for Homepage, fantastic project

I understand what you’re saying, but the fighting against Lolicon doesn’t necessarily take away from the fight against real CSAM. The reality is serious, far-reaching, and, ultimately, human issues like the exploitation of children are complex and require effort on multiple fronts to be effective.

1. The amount of people warped by COD or Lolicon is not 100%, but it’s certainly not 0%
2. It sounds like you haven’t actually played COD because the game is about WARFARE, not domestic terrorism. Maybe ask people who joined the US military how inspired they were by the game

Nobody is protecting digital children and it’s almost always disingenuous when this argument is claimed to be made. The effort is to stop the normalization of the sexualization children. Lolicon is exclusively about romancing or sexualizing children. Deluded adults who think what happens in lolicon material is ok are potential risks to real children. Allowing such a risk to children for the pleasure of these adult is absurd.