• 2 Posts
  • 43 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2023

help-circle




  • Took me a little bit to understand it but in summary the mechanic is that failing rolls reduces your points eventually forcing you to need to feed.

    I don’t really get the point of euphoria vs thirst though. Say I begin on 5 which seems to be the best starting option, I’ve got a 2:1 chance of failing my roll so very likely I will drop to 4. Now I have a 1:1 chance of failure so I might stay at the 4 or 3 level for longer. As soon as I’m down to 2 the odds of failure increase again, so I would need to feed.

    Your rules don’t specify how to calculate the points to recover when feeding, I would definitely add that.

    I’d also consider changing the dice mechanic to a linear progression, potentially - unless there’s some additional mechanic to it that I’ve missed.

    The way they do it in Cosmic Dark feels like it would fit well here. They roll a d6 to get a result, but in times of stress or if they feel it’s appropriate they can roll a “change” die. That starts on 1 and if you roll higher it goes up by one. So it gets progressively less likely to hit, but you’re out of the game when you reach 6.





  • Oh yeah then the options basically are you draw it, you nick some similar picture and photoshop it, you commission someone, or you use the image generator.

    I’d say for the token itself, I would hope it would not need to be so detailed. But if you want to show key art in full (I don’t feel like specific sunglasses features are going to be visible on a token anyway), then you need a full image…

    I’ve tried the image generators for handout images before, the results were OK but it’s still time consuming and there’s obviously the environmental impact of what you’re doing, which we have limited data on





  • It probably means something like mothership as well, where the character sheet is designed such that it guides you on how to fill it without the need for a separate book.

    But really I’m not sure I agree much with the article. I could be wrong but it seems to me that the audience is growing and therefore what the audience want is becoming more diverse.

    My own very biased experience is I that I started playing dungeons and dragons, literally having no clue about this gigantic iceberg of other stuff with a 50+ year history behind it. Did that for a few years, through the pandemic etc.

    Fast forward a bit, the idea of playing Combat rpgs now (so pathfinder, 5.5, whatever) interests me almost not at all. I want to tell stories and try out new personalities. I’ve now played a ton of Call of Cthulhu (which I’d argue is extremely rules light if you want it to be), Delta Green, Mork Borg, Vaesen and would have played dozens more if I had a more local group to play with.

    Would love to play some Blades though… Weirdly a bit like Delta Green, you’d think it would be great for easier to organise one shots but actually you need a short campaign to get the most of it, I would say

    I might be on the minority on all that, I don’t know!








  • I’ve been reading up on some of these and starting to go back through previous years.

    One concept I’ve been thinking about is something i think I heard Jared Logan mention (Stream of Blood, Glass Cannon GM). It was running combat as 3, 2, done. Ie only ever three rounds of “what do you do” and then the overall outcome is adjudicated which is a cool idea. Obviously not for games like pathfinder etc where combat is largely the point of it all, but i have less and less interest in running those kind of games.

    It’s social interactions and puzzle solving ideally for me! Or extremely lethal stuff like Mork Borg where speedy combat is somewhat built in