The law will then say E2EE is forbidden. And then the next step is making Telegram as a prime example to strip out E2EE because “Look how many bad guys we can catch without E2EE”.
The law will then say E2EE is forbidden. And then the next step is making Telegram as a prime example to strip out E2EE because “Look how many bad guys we can catch without E2EE”.
I see. I’ve skimmed the docs and indeed see that it supports a lot of IDP with what looks to me some env var. And thanks for answering another question of what their auth library is since that is a lot to support.
There aren’t enough swear-words in the English language, so now I’ll have to call you perkeleen vittupää just to express my disgust and frustration with this crap.
Beautiful
The second premise is very dependent on the algorithm and the hardware itself. “Faster” can be very different when parallelization comes into play. Baring that, ASIC’s also a thing. Also, Moore’s law has not been very relevant since around 2020? The new Moore’s law is power efficiency and not transistor density. Say for example, we’ve peaked at 5GHz on a single core performance with x86 ISA. Then the next step is how to reduce the power consumption for the same 5GHz.
Now, the readme mentioned about using Argon2id. A cpu-memory-hard function. So you are also limited by the theoretical maximum memory that you could allocate to crack the puzzle faster.
Oh, thanks. Yeah, I know what it is. And I’ll keep it to myself as I understand your stance on not revealing yourself!
I’m gonna take a guess, either it is BlackMagicProbe OR Bus Pirate. Both are amazing tools to have!
GPL v2 don’t, which lead to tivoization. But Linus himself didn’t agree with that standing.
For NAT, there is apparently a way to traverse NAT. I haven’t tried it tho, but the dude has a lot of research on the topic (NAT traversal), so if that didn’t work, maybe others will
But the recommendation can make better inference if they have more data wouldn’t they? What should have happened is opt-in for a better recommendation.
Yes, that’s it! Now that you mentioned it I’ve started to re read it. It was as wack as I remember lol. And it was an ogre btw!
No, not just the installer. Actually the installer doesn’t even matter here as its sole purpose is placing the binary. GPL applies when you make modifications to the program AND you distribute the program. GPL states that you MUST also give the source of the modified binary WHEN requested by those who got the modified program (this is very simplifying it)
There is a comic that I can’t remember the title of right now. But the plot is basically the whole country of Japan gets Isekai’d, land and all
Why… why is it more secure? Does it mean AI training is actively abusing copyright law? And this is more secure because they can hide it better?
Android is open source so it can be customized. If a country decides to use Android I’m pretty sure they can spend a budget to modify and vet the source code being used by their device rather than re-inventing the wheel.
WebRTC can be used, and there is public STUN or TURN server
I think technically, the source should be the native format of whatever image manipulation program that you use. For vector graphics, there is svg format but the native editor is still preferable. Otherwise, whoever gets the end copy cannot easily modify or reproduce it, only copy it. But it of course depends on the definition of “easy” and a lot of other factors. Licensing is hard and it is because I am not a lawyer.
Ahh, I see what you mean. Thanks for explaining it
I wanted OpenSAGE to mature more quickly so modders of CnC can have a field day with it. This looks like a nice in-between for me