How is tracking better than blocking tracking? What kind of world are you living in?
How is tracking better than blocking tracking? What kind of world are you living in?
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4387539/firefox-money-investigating-the-bizarre-finances-of-mozilla or any other site that has been talking about it for years.
Nope. The money does not go to Firefox. Please read your own links before.
uBlock Origin. Why would Firefox submit anything except HTTP requests in order to interact with the web site?
Why would I track myself? That’s dumb.
You can’t donate to the Firefox project.
As a user, I don’t need this.
You described ad tracking. Also why is an open source browser wasting time and money to create such a feature that no user needs?
I agree with Microsoft for once. I get all my online content on the open web of TPB. It’s freeware, if you like. It is the understanding.
Both users?
I agree but this thing could be cleaned on DDG’s side.
FLAC is supposed to be way smaller: https://hbfs.wordpress.com/2012/02/07/looking-at-flac-compression-ratios/
I use Opus at 192 kbps. It’s overkill but it should be almost perfect and has the size of an MP4.
I’m also curious to know why. I’ve used SVN for years, and I got the biggest relief when git or Mercurial appeared.
Back when Nginx started, Apache was the only alternative and a big pain in the ass. That’s how it became popular.