OK yeah but every major “news” channel is like this

That’s literally “whataboutism”.

Then I’m confused what is your point on Halting Problem vis-a-vis hallucinations being un-mitigable qualities of LLMs? Did I misunderstood you proposed “return undecided (somehow magically, bypassing Halting Problem)” to be the solution?

How would token prediction machine arrive at undecidable? I mean would you just add a percentage threshold? Static or calculated? How would you calculate it?

(Why jfc? Because two people downvoted you? Dood, grow some.)

Relevant Betty White skit:

https://youtu.be/fbI1eJ_zAB8

“Supremacist” might be a better word

Does not have widgets/has some limited plugins. Can’t have apps pinned on screen. Looks nifty but it’s unusable for me :(

Let me clarify what I wrote: I can’t access the google stored document because they send it only to approved people. Do you have access to it and can you share?

They seem to be focusing very much on NOT using LLMs yourself, but buying an SaaS offering providing LLM instead.

95% are failing, and:

Companies surveyed were often hesitant to share failure rates,

Oh. So it’s at least 95%?

Edit:

Source is MIT Nanda project - isn’t that an university project? I can’t access it, can anyone share? I’m curious about the methodology and data set

Cool cool cool.

My go to test is to search for water shoes / swimming shoes that are either size EU 48 or extra wide.

This shiet can’t even find only “water shoes”, instead recommending shoes to me.

Seems to be useless trash-proxy to Bing and Google?

deleted by creator

Why do people who obviously prefer a rules light set of rules play something as rigid and overcomplicated as DnD.

Because the entry barrier is low, a lot of groups playing DnD/Pathfinder, tons of content, it’s mainstream, celebrities play it so the rules are shallowly known to a lot of people.

At least that’s my take.

Wouldn’t you find far more enjoyment in systems lile fate or savage worlds?

Fate is Fudge, and as I mentioned I prefer it over DnD

I see what you’re saying, but… To me that’s okay? I don’t need to follow the book for all that shiet? You don’t need to overspecialize on your character sheet.

In DnD/Pathfinder you grab the Lore/Knowledge/etc skill for a wide range of actions. The nobility will respect your cleric because it’s a cleric, has a symbol of the order, ecclesiastic rank from the roleplaying, but if she can’t persuade for shiet, she’ll loose that initial respect quickly.

Have you ever played Shadowrun? I think I left that system the moment my DM decided to reference table for jumping out of a riding car by / brand / speed / manoeuvre / skill level to determine my damage.

The Dark Eye is that German thingy, right? I never liked it as a system, it felt constraining. On the other hand, my favourite system is Fudge, so we might just like different things.

During investigations the wizard rolls an investigation check, the cleric rolls an investigation check and the barbarian does nothing because they dumped wisdom

You might be playing it wrong.

During investigations Wizard checks the books in the library, references his own notes, chats up local researcher community. Creates and sends Arcane Eye, spreads his familiars, tries Clairvoyance.

Cleric visits a local church, talks to the priests and churchgoers, prays to the Divine, maybe convinces the town to join her in the crusade against the target and lits the town on fire, while villages attack the nobleman mansion looking for the culprit and plunder.

Barbarian goes to the local tavern to drink with the local guards. Helps local elder find his kitten. Maybe talks to a local hunter and they bond over a bear hunt they just finished, maybe about the beauty of wilderness… One thing leads to another, a secret touch, a hidden look, a moment of courage, a stolen kiss… What I was talking about?

If you’re located in EU this could be a great case for DSA-based mediation. If you’re pissed maybe try reaching out to a DSA appointed mediator in your country?

Size and noise I guess.

Pathfinder 2.0 sidestepped this issue by having class-specific feats instead of subclasses. Just pick which features you want dude, no need to be silly about it. And you get a new choice of class specific feats often.

Um… I’ve read the document, where does it say anything nefarious? All I can see is unifying requirements for metadata storage and time to live?

As in - to what exactly should I object, where’s the hidden poison?

What is this shit. Late night commercials?

First device is just an old fashioned walking machine (or whatever it’s called), marketed to elderly.

Second device is a voice activated doll on wheels.

Thanks dude. I’m not sure what I’m looking at though. As I mentioned in the top post, I’m new to this and it’s not my hobby.

You listed hardware, but gave no context how good it is for my needs - I think that’s why you got downvoted.

Thank you~!

I want to spend as little time on it as I can. Then I’d like to minimize the initial cost of it, or at least cost of exploitation.

I’m fairly busy with my hobbies (Lego and Arkham Horror LCG), so I’m looking for the solution. I’d rather spend more money than more time.

On the other hand, if I waste money on garbage I’m going to be cross and do it from the scratch again, so I’m trying to hedge my options before I commit - if that makes sense.