It’s funny, I don’t think I would even understand the attack matrix reference, had I not just watched a yt series about Gamma World (and Metamorphosis Alpha).
It’s funny, I don’t think I would even understand the attack matrix reference, had I not just watched a yt series about Gamma World (and Metamorphosis Alpha).
Honestly, perception checks should be rolled behind the screen. Or anything where the character wouldn’t immediately know the outcome.
Sure, players shouldn’t act on things their character doesn’t know, but why give them the temptation?
Or mind-affecting stuff with will saves.
First I misread the headline as “transgender cows” and then you’re in the comments talking about straight people insulin.
I think it’s time for bed.
It gets even weirder in terms of game mechanics. High strength and no armor is kind of an unusual combination. Barbarians and bards (buff or otherwise) both typically wear armor. As do fighters, rangers, rogues, clerics…
Wizards and sorcerers don’t but also don’t usually benefit much from strength. (Not to mention that bard is a strange multi for either.)
Conclusion: Terry as pictured is clearly a monk/bard.
There’s a quest like that in the recent Rogue Trader crpg, in which you help a party member obtain a permit from the Administratum.
You could do something like ((d6-1)*20+d20)/15.
But that’s an awful lot of work just to avoid having a d8.
You don’t even need a special die for this. Just roll a d8 and subtract 4 if it’s 5-8. Just like using a d6 as a d3.
“Train pirate” has got to be one of the steampunkiest job titles I’ve ever heard.
Also taking legal action against people who helped your customers resolve the consequences of such an attack seems perfectly normal and not at all contrary to that narrative.
Could magic overcome, resolve or undo a disability?
Some, certainly. Assuming D&D, mid-level clerics can restore missing limbs (and, though the spell description doesn’t mention them specifically, I would argue ocular, auditory, and spinal injuries as well). So disability due to injury should at least be less common than in the real world.
Congenital issues, on the other hand, are much more difficult. Wish would work, but that’s not exactly accessible.
That said, there’s considerable potential for the magical equivalent of prostheses and other accessibility devices to be more effective than their real-world counterparts.
(laughs in maths)
D&D math jokes? Let’s go!
Q: What phases through stone and is equivalent to the axiom of choice?
A: Xorn’s Lemma
Note, too, that there is value in being rigorous about “common sense” assertions.
Some of the most exciting discoveries happen when something everybody assumed they knew turns out to be wrong.
The term “warlock” comes from a root (Old English, wærloga) that literally means “pact-breaker”.
So I’d say it’s very much in the spirit of the class to eventually betray one’s patron.
IIRC there were builds in 3e D&D that could crit on something insane like 11 or 12.
✔️ Goggles
✔️ Coveralls
✔️ Wrench as big as she is?
…Gadget?
Haast’s Eagle is said to have sometimes hunted and killed people (it’s main prey were moa, so it was definitely physically capable of it) but it’s been extinct for like 600 years.
Is there a difference between biochar and charcoal? Because that description of biochar sounds like it’s just charcoal.
He died doing what he loved: That guy’s mom.
“Roll a d6”