Physical beauty*

What you described here, a flawed but still loveable person, is also beautiful - just not in an immediately visible way.

Alright, you do you - just be careful. Hopefully you find yourself in a better situation someday where you won’t need something to get you through the day.

It’s bad for your gut, it’s bad for your liver, it’s bad for your brain, it’s bad for your skin.

Whatever bullshit you’re telling yourself here is false. Replacing cigarettes with cocaine because cocaine won’t give you lung cancer is fucking brain damaged thinking.

I visited Hyderabad recently and didn’t struggle with any dish that was made for me. I told them to make it spicy as well, and I asked my friends to verify that it actually was spicy.

I think most Americans are just cry babies. Now, the food poisoning did fuck me up, real bad. That was a very quick ‘no I think I go home now’.

Stop doing math 😡

Mine were given to me as gifts by my mom, let me try to find them for you.

Edit: I’m gonna be totally honest, I think she bought them from Amazon or Walmart. If you look up swing top glass bottles you should see them, they’re 33 fl. oz.

I’m American and I fucking love those glass water bottles. I use them everyday, that exact kind.

12.99 gets you three socks a month, it’s a steal.

Brother literacy rates in Canada aren’t doing so hot either.

Canadian says dumb shit, more at 11

If only wars were won with guns these days and not drones. Oh but I guess that would require admitting reality, not politics — I see.

Mm, you can fixate on killing someone without using a gun.

You could use a knife, a rope, poison, there are any number of things you can use to kill someone.

Maybe that 93% just very specifically envisions harming others without guns!

Lol no, many of them are lying.

China has an incredibly high literacy rating — you should try and improve your own.

Probably, considering the meaning of dual

that’s nearly the definition of fascism?

Yes, which is why they need to put this kind of disclaimer in their handbook — lest they end up with chuds like the Warhammer franchise. Those chuds being the ones that don’t understand that the Imperium is really bad.

The more people who hate Jews, the more galvanized the Israeli ethnostate becomes.

So you ask them which way leads to the castle and you don’t pick the way they say.

If we’re assuming that these things are actually bound by some kind of rule stating they literally cannot lie or literally cannot tell the truth.

That is false

I had to force myself to keep reading this.

thanks for caring about not biasing me

Games are games, I try not to yuck anyone’s yum.

What is it about Daggerheart that makes you think it’s nothing more than a platform to continue their failing brand?

I think that if you look at campaign 2 and 3 of Critical Role — there is a very clear decline in quality. This decline in quality has retroactively permeated things like Legend of Vox Machina (Pike, the cleric, suddenly deciding ‘Gods r bad’. Very clearly mimicking the poor narrative decisions Matt has made.).

Now, I don’t know if Daggerheart is bad — really it just sounds like it’s a platform for improv performance, which I don’t dislike! I also think you’re right on the money about the square peg in the round hole. I think what I need to see from Daggerheart is that it’s worth the amount of effort they put into it, considering how they’ve treated their DnD campaigns.

TL;DR — it’s hard for me to separate the lack of quality in CR’s recent campaigns from Daggerheart. I gave up on CR a long time ago, Daggerheart needs to prove itself to me, and can’t be through CR.