Accessing files unauthenticated……the devs explicitly say they won’t fix it…… and you think that’s not a huge security hole? Software with something like that marked as “won’t fix” is a giant no-no for me. If they’re ok with that, their software should be nowhere near an internet connection.
The person with a fundamental misunderstanding is you.
The developers of jellyfin themselves say it’s not.
VPN is the only way I would ever be doing it.
It’s not secure. It’s a horrible thing to do
You clearly don’t understand how Plex and port forwarding work if you think that is in any way the same as opening a port to the Internet for everyone to hit jellyfin with zero security on it.
The CVE has been exploited zero times that we know of, and at worst they can delete your media files and Plex server. It’s never been reported of happening, and we have no idea how difficult it is to do - but because it hasn’t happened, it’s probably extremely hard and requires a chain of very unlikely things to have happened first.
A criminal living in jail to win 500k? It’s not like he can leave……
OK so you don’t understand networking, don’t understand how Plex works, don’t understand how that CVE does nothing of the sort, and have poor reading comprehension skills.
I’d hate to be your poor server.
He never claimed that in the comment you replied to.
Plex doesn’t open a port to the internet at large, unsecured no less, like jellyfin does.
That poster specifically said if you open jellyfin up to the internet ……
Anyone using jellyfin should not be exposing it to the public internet.
The design is clear when you look at the entire screen and not just the bottom section like the screenshot has. Context matters.
This is the “incoming call” screen. It’s not the “already in a call” screen. The decline button is the same button as if you weren’t already in a call, because that’s what it does - decline the incoming call. It gives you 2 options to answer the incoming call in regards to your existing call. The only other option would be “end current call and decline incoming call”, but that’s not an option that anyone would ever really use.
As it is, it’s perfect for the context that it’s seen in. The OP has removed all that context though, which is adding to the confusion people are having.
Does that make a bit more sense now?
I’m going to assume you aren’t an iPhone user, correct? That’s all this is really - people who don’t use iPhones, who dislike Apple/iPhones, ragging on a UI that makes perfect sense in the context it’s used.
That’s unnecessary though, because of course declining the incoming call means you stay on the call you’re already on.
The decline button only performs one action, which is why it only has one icon.
It is visually consistent with the incoming call screen that every iPhone user knows. When you are on a call and another call comes in, you get the incoming call screen - not the existing call screen, which has completely different buttons like the number pad and speaker phone etc.
I think that’s where the confusion is coming from for most people - they don’t use iPhones and they don’t know what the “incoming call” screen and the “currently in a call” screens look like.
When you do, you see why this isn’t an issue.
It is and it isn’t. Currently, even on a single call, it is both the decline button and the hang up/end call button. People on iPhones are used to this as it is how it has worked forever.
When a call comes in while you’re on a call, the screen is essentially the “new incoming call” screen - it shows the incoming callers ID, and has the ability to answer with actions performed on your current call, and to decline the call. It follows the existing pattern and behaviour. It also says “decline call” underneath it, to get rid of any ambiguity.
I honestly don’t see a better, more clear way of doing this ui. You would rarely want to do an “end current call, and decline incoming call”, so having 2 red phone icons wouldn’t make sense. There’s never been an icon to “continue call” so adding one just for this situation would be more confusing.
That pattern would be wrong though, as the green phone icon means answer the call.
The left button has 2 icons as it performs 2 actions:
The right button has 2 icons as it performs 2 actions:
The middle button therefore only needs 1 icon:
That makes no sense. The middle button is fine as it is because it’s just to decline the incoming call and leave everything else as is. The other 2 buttons perform 2 actions, hence 2 icons on each.
I’m not sure if this is an “English as a second language” thing, but you can’t decline a call that you’ve already answered. You would end/finish/hang up.
Decline means to say “no I don’t want to answer”.
How could you decline a call that you already answered?
Just wait til movie studios start fishing for people hosting their movies illegally. With how everyone standardises their media structure and file names these days, finding people hosting your movie would be a cinch.