I always divide by two and round up for d3
I always divide by two and round up for d3
Been a while since I saw a reference to exceptional strength
Not enough robot arms to be Magnus Burnsides
Not to just keep replying to you but it’s also very doable online if you can’t find players where you are
You can’t. You can do better sometimes but there will still be hiccups. As far as I’m aware the groups most likely to be actually consistent have been playing together since they were in school.
This isn’t meant to be discouraging at all! The opposite in fact. Don’t let those hiccups, common or rare, stop you. Just be aware of their possibility and ready to adapt. Ability to adapt is the most useful tool in the GM toolbox at the table and approaching it.
While reading this comment I had the thought of a stoic warrior type that was very much an outsider to the society he was mostly operating in but very open to learning about the things that are new to him. Occasionally he would really embrace some part of that culture and make his own references to it.
I’d probably call him Jaxson and get away with it until he said indeed.
I made a villain probably more than 15 years ago at this point that, to this day, any player who was in that campaign will promptly tell me “fuck you” if I mention him or do a little flourish with my finger.
Philip the Brigand! He was born of several suggestions for memorability. A title, not just a name. Personality flair (such as, but not limited to, the flourish), and a knack for escape being the three I remember. Not plot armor, for sure. A great eye for knowing when the battle wasn’t going his way though, which was usually shortly after ruining the party’s day. Like when he loosed a rust monster that destroyed the fighter’s treasured sword and also broke the monk’s arm.
Mostly they pictured an incredibly annoying version of Autolycus from Xena/Hercules. Not unfair.
What kind of backwards, boring ass DM does that?
Did y’all form up another group without them?
I suspect something else is going on there. I made that switch years ago and haven’t found a site that doesn’t play nice with Firefox in that time.
Nah. I’ve had a domain registered with them for years and I just got the email too
I think you’re wrong on the overwhelming majority and that they’ll still be fine with it should it happen.
Good luck I guess
Except it’s less likely to be donation based and more likely to be fee based.
The fact that you’re aware of any kind of ad blocking for Netscape reinforces my position that blocking was a leader in the arms race
And nothing of value was lost I guess
There were no adblocking extensions for early internet explorer so consider its share 0.
What you consider it to be is irrelevant. An extension wasn’t any more the only way to block ads then than it is now. Ad blocking has absolutely been happening longer than there have been extensions to do it.
Adblocking increased at twice the rate of new internet users
Which means it’s going to reach a critical mass at some point, no? What would you expect to happen then?
very obviously trolling or roleplaying
Damn am I sick of people falling on this regardless of what the disagreement is over or who it is with. Even if it were true, which it’s not, you have a better picture of the situation, at least if you’re willing to accept that someone legitimately disagrees with you.
I’m sorry to hear about your food
There’s something perversely amusing, given the conversation, how you seem to expect me to answer your question without seemingly being willing to answer mine.
I’ll answer, but not until you’ve extended the courtesy of doing so yourself with the questions you’ve already been asked.
And I get the impression you weren’t around for the first ad blockers. I recall it very differently and unless you have something to back up your end of it we’re at a bit of an impasse.
I’ve been around far longer than you think.
It absolutely has bearing. It’s directly related to how we consider our fellow humans.
It’s also not simply a question of more money. It can absolutely be a question of any money.
Is it ethical to consume a product or service put out for sale, in one method or another, to the public without paying for it?
If a local farmer sells eggs at a farmer’s market would you take one and eat it? Why or why not? Does the number of eggs he has for sale change your answer? What if others are also doing so? You did say there’s nothing wrong with trying to get everything for free before, didn’t you?
auto ad skipping has been a feature since at least 2002
And do you recall when the obnoxious banners and pop ups during shows started to happen with regularity?
any clearly separate banner, pop up, intermediate page etc placed around the main content
Given the above, what factors would you figure contributed to the decline of that type of ad?
I can block a banner ad
Precisely
As far as I am concerned content online is easily replaceable
I bet the people who hunted animals to extinction thought the same. At some point it stops being worth the effort to make another.
No matter what you or I do, web content will survive
See my previous statement about animal extinction
the market will evolve new ways to separate us from our money
And another like you will complain about it, block it, and the cycle continues while the masses complain about how it wasn’t this bad before without an ounce of consideration to their own part in the whole thing. Wanna guess how I know?
As a question, how do you feel about data mining and tracking?
This whole paragraph looks like it’s supposed to be some kind of gotcha. It’s not. I’ve made it very clear from the start what I’m against is blocking all ads. By all means block the ones that are legitimately malicious. But I remember when the blocker in the post announced they’d be allowing non-malicious ads, which met certain published criteria, to go through the blocking. Ublock was the new darling pretty much overnight.
I do block various ads and trackers. I do not blanket block everything that could be considered an ad.
You think no one has ever had to spend time and money dealing with a picked pocket or a pothole on a road they drive every day? It’s not always as easy as you make it sound. Just like a lot of times you run an antivirus and it takes care of everything. Not always but sometimes your whole identity is stolen and it can be years later and you’re still dealing with problems. Guess you shouldn’t have gone to the gas station you always go to.
Why would sites go back to stock banner ads when they’re so easily blocked. Why do you think they stopped? The same culture you’re now defending pushed them out. Now it’s an arms race with stronger measures on both sides all the time.
You lose nothing by blocking ads today. At some point the bill comes due and either you can’t block them so easily or you lose access to the content you want to see. You’re pulling pebbles away from a levee and telling everyone it’s safe because nothing has happened.
d% is what I usually see