They have a doorbell: https://reolink.com/__/product/reolink-video-doorbell/
It doesn’t really get smaller than that.
They have a doorbell: https://reolink.com/__/product/reolink-video-doorbell/
It doesn’t really get smaller than that.
Someone has serious issues with being wrong. You were the first one to change the subject to say wifi required passwords.
I’m not talking about dishwashers, and only have ever mentioned wifi. I’m talking about how you’re wrong that there can’t be open networks. Don’t change the subject just because you’re wrong. You seem to have an issue with being incorrect. It’s a sad look on you.
Show me where I said anything about a dishwasher. Or defended it in any way. Are you just pissed that you were wrong? That’s pretty pathetic.
Explain the 30+ million open WiFi networks on Wigle if WiFi networks require a password.
"Am I wrong?
No, it is everyone else who is wrong."
You’re the meme. No router has ever required it. Yes, it’s an option. But how do you think open networks exist? Do you think that magically the router will know it’s in a residence and suddenly require a password?
How do you explain the 30 million+ open networks on Wigle? https://wigle.net/stats
It as a protocol does not and has never required a password. Nor have routers ever required it.
You’ll need to download the client off-network (have you tried the local library for that?) and put it on your PC. If you know how to use docker, you could set up the client via docker and dockerhub which I doubt is blocked, but you’d need to set docker up on windows which I have no experience with.
You can also try wireguard on a non-standard port if there are further blocks. OVPN can also go over 443 which might help.
Really though, it depends on how they’re blocking them. They could be blocking the protocol based on port or deep packet inspection, or they could just be blocking a list of VPN hosts. They could be doing both.
If they’re just blocking hosts, you could set up a vpn relay on a host somewhere else, but that won’t help if they’re blocking the protocol.
Frigate is absolutely fantastic, especially Frigate+. I use all Reolink and it works great.
Tasker could probably do at least the bluetooth and location toggles, I haven’t tried the mic and camera though.
It should be noted that if a hacker is able to exploit this, they’d need a lot of access and you’d already be boned. This is no where as bad as what Intel is going through right now.
Saying that you have to “basically throw away your computer” is very misleading to say especially in a subtitle, when that exact thing is actually what is happening with Intel CPUs.
do they think only bad devs create bugs? it’s part of programming.
And only for now until it inevitably gets appealed.
Somehow my Xfinity alias I used last year (before I escaped them, thank god) was stolen and it gets spam from time to time. Xfinity hasn’t reported a breach, but somehow it’s the only one I’ve caught so far.
This doesn’t add any extra tracking, in fact it’s intent is to make interacting with advertising more anonymous from a user perspective (click that learn more button).
On top of that, the author says “…or switching to a more privacy-conscious browser such as Google Chrome”, which pretty much invalidates everything they have to say.
No, you still need to follow the original license in most cases.
There’s a few ways, but for example you can use a service like cloudflared which comes with its own certs (and then set up WAF rules to only allow your IP), or you could set something up using let’s encrypt via reverse proxy (for example, using Opnsense and the let’s encrypt plugin which actually validates domains that aren’t otherwise exposed to the internet, there by giving you full blown validated SSL).
If you don’t care about validation errors then you can use nginx reverse proxies (locally, not exposing any ports externally) and apply self-signed certs through the proxy regardless of whether or not the software allows SSL config.
Yep, should be free unless you want more firewall features!
Maybe nginx does, but cloudflared does not, as far as I know (since it’s an outbound tunnel). I haven’t ever had to open any ports for cloudflared. However, it obviously requires you to use cloudflare.
I have this level1techs KVM which can drive my 5120x1440 @ 120hz monitor (without DSC) AND my 3840x2160 @ 240hz monitor (also without DSC). It’s $450, but Wendell and level1techs are great and it’s well worth the price.
I’m running Fedora on one host and Ubuntu on the other. With Windows, you can use DSC to drive huge resolutions at 240hz.