• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “Hello, this brand of tools that was specifically made for people to learn about? Yes, you’re no longer allowed to attempt to understand how they work.”

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Are RISCV microcontrollers out yet? Might be a good idea to rally around making a fully open IDE ecosystem and breakout board standard for it (maybe even make it pin compatible with the old school Arduino, surely they can’t sue for that right?)

  • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Thankfully, this doesn’t seem to apply to code written outside of the Arduino ecosystem, so i ASSUME that if you’re writing code for a cloned board using PlatformIO that these new terms don’t apply to you

    If that’s not the case, I’ll switch to micropython (probably easier anyway)

  • Ardens@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Here’s the solution. Stop using Arduino. That’s how people power work. Then a new open alternative will pop up, and people can start using that. Ones desire to create and build, should never belong to only one brand - but a universal brand - whenever possible.

    • seitzer@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Here’s a problem. Schools are full of them. They are really, really good for that specific field. People only think about their private use, but education will suffer the most. Or taxpayers, because they have to pay the bill. Again.

    • Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      13 hours ago

      i think it was already dead and replaced by the esp32s - the original arduinos are too expensive for what actually offered: get the performance of a 8-bit cpu with 2k RAM but at raspberry pi prices

      • limdaepl@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Exactly. Why would anyone still use Arduino when alternatives are both better and cheaper?

        • sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I still use em cause they work and thats what I learned. my projects are simple enough: ultrasonic sensor detects when someones near, activates a relay etc

          • bearboiblake@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            The good news is that there are a billion no-name brands in China etc. manufacturing drop-in replacement Arduino-compatible boards.

            I got into microcontrollers through Arduino but very quickly moved to much cheaper (and tbh, better) third-party options.

            • sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              yeah none of my props actually use name brand arduinos. theyre “for arduino nano” chinese boards. cheap as hell and, touch wood, havent failed even after one went haywire from being wet too long… next season it was back to functioning completely normally

    • modus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Hopefully places like Adafruit will stop stocking them. They should also post explanations for people searching directly for them.

  • xiao yun@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Qualcomm has quietly made some massive changes to Arduino’s Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, marking a clear departure from the platform’s founding principles.

    According to Adafruit, the new policies introduce sweeping user-license provisions, broaden data collection (particularly around AI usage), and embed long-term account data retention, all while integrating user information into Qualcomm’s broader data ecosystem.

    Section 7.1 grants Arduino a perpetual, irrevocable license over anything you upload. Your code, projects, forum posts, and comments all fall under this. This remains in effect even after you delete your account. Arduino retains rights to your content indefinitely.

    The license is also royalty-free and sublicensable. Arduino can use your content however they want, distribute it, modify it, and even sublicense it to others.

    The terms further state that users are not allowed to reverse engineer or attempt to understand how the platform works unless Arduino gives permission. Adafruit argues that this contradicts the values that made Arduino attractive to educators, researchers, and hobbyists.

    The Privacy Policy states Arduino is wholly owned by Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. User data, including from minors, flows to other Qualcomm Group companies.

  • abominable_panda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Stupid question.

    Does this apply to what you write and upload on the Arduino IDE to your boards? Or just whatever you publish on their website/ cloud?

  • dustycups@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Beagle boards are looking better - What other alternatives are recommended?
    Edit: sorry, I was thinking of SBC’s. Blue pills & ESP are good hardware, the libraries & toolchain Im not so sure about.