

While the drones are armed, they use non-lethal or less-lethal weaponry,
Less lethal? So still lethal.
Why is everyone so keen on making Terminator real?
While the drones are armed, they use non-lethal or less-lethal weaponry,
Less lethal? So still lethal.
Why is everyone so keen on making Terminator real?
A better way to say that (more accurate) is that abusers often learnt “how” through personal experience.
The key point is not to look at someone who has been abused and think that they are likely going to become an abuser.
They maintained it, but I think it was energy negative.
That’s obviously a cello.
“Recieving stolen goods” is prosecutable.
It’s a lesser crime than the original theft though.
ID seems to be quite ingrained into Spanish life already. It really surprised me when I needed an ID number to buy a metro ticket.
They are under development, and there is a small market for development machines. It also allows the manufacturer to understand the issues they’ll get once the high performance processors are here.
Nobody has really made performance implementations yet. They’re all IoT level or low end mobile device.
Tenstorrent are probably the closest to having something serious.
That quality gate hasn’t been doing it’s job for a long time.
If this is is the guy that recently had Bernie on, then I think he’s mainly poorly informed and unable to realise when a politician is spinning a line for ulterior motives.
Ah, so you’re a waffle guy!
The AI bubble is currently grinding my gears on this. “XXX is an open source model”. No, it’s not. Do I have access to all of the information necessary to recreate it? No, I don’t as nobody releases training data.
Training data is the source of these models. Without it, they are just free use.
The trouble is that “core” is just that. The heart of the processor. There’s a lot of shared state in the caches and the TLBs which is all common to multiple cores.
At this point I think speculation attacks are almost being accepted as the price of having high performance processors. It’s almost impossible to rewind all non-architectural state when you hit a mis-speculated branch.
Probably because although there are fabs going up around the world (USA and Europe) TSMC Taiwan seem to hold the latest technology nodes, and aren’t they interested in growing capacity. They seem to like having the high end expensive limited process. All the other fabs are coming up with processes 2 or 3 generations back. (5 or 7, not 2 or 3).
All means that although there’s a market for the optics, it’s not the bleeding edge stuff.
“Dozens”. Really?!?!
With batteries that would have a multi-day cycle like these ones, you’re going to be trying to flatten out the demand curve (and supply, but the two are related).
The US generates 4.2 PWh a year, and so averages a consumption rate of about 480GW. So, in an ideal system we’d only need this level of generation capacity and if it was higher sometimes and lower others the batteries would smooth it all out.
I’m going to take your 560GW figure as representative of normal demand above the 480GW average. I’ll say half of every day is 80GW above average (when we’d be draining batteries) and half is 80GW below (when we’d be charging). The real curves are much more nuanced, but we’re establishing context. 80GW for 12 hours is 960GWh, so let’s call it 1TWh of battery capacity needed for the whole USA to smooth out a day.
That’s 117 of these installation, which frankly I find amazing that it’s so low.
I don’t seen how else you do it.
“Removing the stigma” is desensitizing by definition. So you want to desensitize through… what? Education?
I expect they’re not self-reporting. That would require self-awareness.