I think that this can be deployed locally. But the structure of the project, as well as the documentation is horrible. I am not even sure what’s going on with the weird skeleton:

$ tree -L 2
.
├── LICENSE
├── old-packages
│   ├── questions
│   ├── results
│   └── score
├── packages
│   ├── questions
│   ├── results
│   └── score
├── README.md
└── web
    ├── contentlayer.config.ts
    ├── docker-compose.yaml
    ├── next.config.js
    ├── package.json
    ├── pnpm-lock.yaml
    ├── postcss.config.js
    ├── posts
    ├── public
    ├── README.md
    ├── src
    ├── tailwind.config.js
    └── tsconfig.json

Why does this look like the astrology for Gen-Z? If this test is based on self-reflection (at least that’s how it seems to me), how does that work for sociopaths and clinical narcissists?

I am content with Matrix and IRC. Discord is a privacy nightmare.

Discord provides outdated, bloated Electron. As if I am going to trust them again.

Thank you for sharing this. I remember using Ventoy quite often back when I was still on Windows. I’ll be sticking with the good old dd command.

There’s a few dozen open-source alternatives out there. Pastezone, Hastebin, 0x0.st, pasta, trashpaste, etc.

OSMAnd works really well. For YTMusic, you can instead pick LibreTube and use it in music player mode.

Section 13 of AGPLv3 and SSPLv1 have different scopes and coverage. Also, from the Stack Exchange - SSPL and the Open Source Definition

License compatibility is already clear: as a copyleft license, the SSPL is incompatible with other copyleft licenses such as GPL or AGPL, but like the GPL or AGPL is one-way compatible with permissive licenses such as MIT, BSD, or Apache 2.0.

More about AGPL violations can be read in the same link I’ve mentioned above.

This is getting so tiring because I’ve mentioned it earlier too - section 13 of AGPLv3 and SSPLv1 have different scopes. Just read this article by ScyllaDB - this is with respect to MongoDB, which has a similar licensing model. If it were “really” open-source, then RedHat wouldn’t have removed MongoDB from their “free” repositories.

Because it does not comply with the Open Source definition?

SSPL violates these two:

6. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor

The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research.

9. License Must Not Restrict Other Software

The license must not place restrictions on other software that is distributed along with the licensed software. For example, the license must not insist that all other programs distributed on the same medium must be open source software.

ELv2 violates these four:

1. Free Redistribution

The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources. The license shall not require a royalty or other fee for such sale.

3. Derived Works

The license must allow modifications and derived works, and must allow them to be distributed under the same terms as the license of the original software.

4. Integrity of The Author’s Source Code

The license may restrict source-code from being distributed in modified form only if the license allows the distribution of “patch files” with the source code for the purpose of modifying the program at build time. The license must explicitly permit distribution of software built from modified source code. The license may require derived works to carry a different name or version number from the original software.

6. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor

The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research.

Simply putting in the AGPLv3 does not remove unfair restrictions. I mean, SSPLv1 is not compatible with AGPLv3.

What a deceptive, and contradictory statement to make, kek. The SSPL is AGPLv3 with Section 13 modified. The net-difference is just one section between personal and commercial use.

The SSPL is based on the GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL), with a modified Section 13 that requires that those making SSPL-licensed software available to third-parties (modified or not) as part of a “service” must release the source code for the entirety of the service, including without limitation all “management software, user interfaces, application program interfaces, automation software, monitoring software, backup software, storage software and hosting software, all such that a user could run an instance of the service using the Service Source Code you make available”, under the SSPL. The chapter structure of the Server Side Public License is identical to that to the AGPL, except that the GPL preamble and application instructions are stripped from the license text.

And meanwhile, have a look at the Elastic License 2.0:

The Elastic License 2.0 applies to our distribution and the source code of all of the free and paid features of Elasticsearch and Kibana. Our goal with ELv2 is to be as permissive as possible, while protecting against abuse. The license allows the free right to use, modify, create derivative works, and redistribute, with three simple limitations:

• You may not provide the products to others as a managed service

• You may not circumvent the license key functionality or remove/obscure features protected by license keys

• You may not remove or obscure any licensing, copyright, or other notices

We tried to minimize the limitations just to those that protect our products and brand from abuse.

You can keep lying to yourself, Shay Banon.

So it does work, but only after a page reload. Compared to the “Dark Background and Light Text” extension, the visuals look really great, but there’s a little hit in performance.

This extension doesn’t seem to be working on LibreWolf?

Just try to find out his old Xbox comments or wherever the heck he used to post on forums. Make them appear on the Google search with his name in quotes, and tell him that employers or his future date can easily spot his poor behaviour as a part of background check. Use Bing for better results. Google hides some result, but not Bing.

Pointless over-reaction from GrapheneOS. GNU is harshly honest about the open-source stuff - blobs are obviously, proprietary, and so are Google-based softwares and services.

It is really hard to use after reading all the related manual, so I never even bothered with setting up an account.

You can’t distribute it with the Rust brand. That part is still true. You could, for example, call it GolfLang, and no one would bother you. Most probably misinformation to snub on a new project.

You’re actually wrong about that. You’re free to modify - just that you can’t distribute them under the “Rust” brand or logo. You can use the mascot - Ferris the crab, however. There’s a alternative project called crablang, if you’re dissatisfied with what Mozilla is doing.

I’m neither in opposition to this, nor do I support this. I don’t use Rust, just stating what that netizen was trying to talk about.

This is what @GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml was talking about. Rust isn’t truly free - there’s a trademark restriction on the brand name and logo for commercial use.