

It merely says “go European”, not “go domestic”. Of course you can join!
It merely says “go European”, not “go domestic”. Of course you can join!
Eh. You might not, but the “normies” might. Expanding the userbase is always a good idea for open source projects.
He clearly needs his mornings to contemplate and relax so he can be infinitely more productive than the average peson.
If only everyone got to choose their schedules as freely and arbitrarily, everyone could be a billionaire like him.
They don’t need the data perpetually to train their AI. Just dump it once into the black box and be done with it - no need to save it for even a second. Of course, if they want to train and re-train, and perhaps build ad profiles, that’s a different matter.
Checked the site quickly and didn’t find the information, but judging by the top-level comment, they don’t charge you if you want to use their cloud service, but if you want to “unlock” the ability to use someone else’s.
Maybe those are imperial seconds and the ohers metric?
Probably “dumb” in the sense it doesm’t actively spy on you. Which is a god-awful definition of dumb.
Personally, I’d go with non-malicious, shortened to non-mal which basically loops back to “normal”.
When your job suddenly rolls out G-Workspace or Office Online without you knowing and you come to work to a Google account with all your personal data, already out of your control, is it really a choice?
Have a job or your data. The stakes are becoming increasingly high.
“If it’s useful, just use them” is an option, in some circumstances. In some, unfortunately, that doesn’t apply. Is keeping your job a “convenience”?
Don’t mean to attack you personally, just want to share my thoughts on the level erosion of privacy to Big Tech.
Ah, the third option.
Is that Motorola’s EULA or buying throug a carrier?
Cloased source does for privacy and security what sweeping problems under the rug does: it mitigates them, a bit, but then when they inevitably do hit, they hit hard.
About that. I heard somewhere wordpress.com and wordpress.org are seperste entities, one for-profit and the other not, but Wikipedia doesn’t mention why they share the same name.
Meh. CTU means stuff comes into e.g. Rotterdam and then easily wherever it needs to go from there, and complaining about “evading sanctions” seems to me like an exercise in futility.
About the Ribbon: Apparently M$ has a patent (or multiple ones on) it, so they ultimately have the last say on what is and isn’t allowed. They did make a licence availiable royalty-free, but I assume that that licence didn’t cover enough of what LibreOffice needed, so they probably struck a deal with M$ about having the option, just not as the default.
I haven’t researched this all that much, so mostly speculation. Although the M$ having a patent part of someting so true. And that patent (apparently) explicitly states that use in directly competing software with M$'s is forbidden, at least for-profit.
Idk, maybe it’s a case of patent restrictions, or LibreOffice being LibreOffice.
Honestly, a really interesting rabbit-hole.
Thank you for the correction!
The english word “free” actually carries two meanings: “free as in free food” (gratis) and “free as in free speech” (libre).
Ollama is both gratis and libre.
And about the money stuff: Ollama used to be Facebook’s proprietary model, an answer to ChatGPT and Bing Chat/Copilot. Facebook lagged behind the other players and they just said “fuck it, we’re going open-source”. That’s how and why it’s free.
Due to it being open-source, even though models are by design binary blobs, the code that interacts with them and runs them is open-source. If they were connecting to the Internet and phoning home to Facebook, chances are this would’ve been found out by the community due to the open nature of the project.
Even if it weren’t open-source, since it runs locally you could at least block (or view) Internet access.
Basically, even though this is from Facebook, one of the big bads of privacy on the Internet, it’s all good in the end.
You forgot a million switches for each “partner”. More like prostitution.
Tenacity is a telemetry-free fork of Audacity for a start
Reminds me of Tom Scott’s Emojli
The EU is not an alliance, since member states give up a good portion of their sovereignty to the bloc. It’s much closer to a “loosely bound US” than a “NATO on steroids”.