Will there be consequences??

lul

thanks that’s a big collection of ethically ambiguous memes ^^

Was this your prompt? This seems to happen a lot then

who?

Microsoft is terrible. Remember they also require you to use a Microsoft account for Minecraft now. Fuck this company so much

It does need only a fraction of the resources.

Wdym?

I will believe it when I see Google face consequences.

Diffie-Hellman is only a key exchange protocol and does not provide forward secrecy. Imagine that my and your client figure out our shared secred (key) with DH, then encrypt our chat with that. If someone breaks only a bit of our traffic, then they can read newer messages as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_secrecy

Forward secrecy means that at any point messages are encrypted with keys that aren’t reused forever, which means if an attacker can intercept traffic and read a bit, or crack the encryption, that they don’t automatically get access to our future conversation as well.

Since Ig we all know this message which appears when the “keys” ig, changed

I don’t know if I fully understand you here.

To my understanding whatsapp does it like this too. The key changing must be the high level key, since the message means that it’s an unknown key (thus not yet trusted). From new install or new device.

Double Ratchet Messaging Encryption - Computerphile

https://youtu.be/9sO2qdTci-s?si=qPbDZ2-x_VSiEZ-1

essentially, yes. There are two levels of encryption keys and they “ratchet” along (change). Only the lower level is used to encrypt the text so it’s much harder to figure out the other one.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_Ratchet_Algorithm

This is the encryption that they developed. Whatsapp and OMEMO (XMPP) use it as well. It has forward secrecy because if an attacker has the key for a message they can’t calculate the key for the key for the next message etc.

good thinking there ;)

You will forever have these feelings, if you have a better world than the status quo in mind. Be careful to not be overwhelmed by them, if you suffer too much long term you could give up or become a cynic. Nothing is perfect, we strive to make better systems (and smartphones).

It means no failed video. The algorithm could push something and there would be no way for users to see if it was received well or not. Youtube will know, they have watchtime etc.

This probably is good for sponsorship. Like the Abby Shapiro videos that were massively pushed through ads. But nobody liked them so they got a lot of downvotes.

Also remember this failed YT thing, Youtube Rewind? Next time nobody will know it was a fail.

oh no they’re gonna do evil