

As a Canadian, I have never thought about shooting anyone, but I have thought about people being shot by someone else who is in no way affiliated with me! Lol


As a Canadian, I have never thought about shooting anyone, but I have thought about people being shot by someone else who is in no way affiliated with me! Lol


It’s sad to think that humanity may have peaked already.
The best time to be alive in the west (unless you’re a minority, because we HAVE made advances in accepting people for who they are) was probably more than half a century ago.
Sure, technology gives us lots of cool stuff. But it’s been discovered that it’s more profitable to keep us fat and addicted, and we’re perfectly content to let all the profits go to the top 0.1 to 1%.


True. Users are able to misconstrue things well beyond my imagination


not protected
Even better…“not connected”.
Being on a VPN doesn’t mean your connection is protected, necessarily.


The website says it uses templates, but they were written by “Matt”. Not sure if that’s an LLM, but it’s at least not using LLMs each time a user visits


I’m not sure if 1/4 to 1/3 of people being gullible is staggering to me


A lot of smart people, scientists even, would be inclined to say “I don’t know if it’s true” with the key word being “know”.
If they’re not familiar with the literature and they’re being exposed to a claim for the very first time, they’d potentially want to consult the research on the matter. (Not “do their own research”, but to look into respectable research done by professionals)
Like all that raw milk stuff? I’ve got no clue what that’s about. And if the claims are like “Raw milk promotes the maintenance of healthy bones and teeth better than homogenized milk” or something, I dunno man. I’ve never heard anything one way or the other. “I don’t know if it’s true”. I might even be leaning towards disbelieving it, but I don’t know.
Can’t you make your Steam friends list private?


how do you know I’m just a child?"
“You just told me, kiddo!”


Unfortunately, I don’t have one.


Is there one god damn phone out there we can buy that’s somewhat ethical and redirects or privacy?
Fairphone? Haven’t been following that, but I’m pretty sure it’s the most ethical phone to consume…at least in theory.


Now everyone will know they aren’t show-ers


The gist is that marketing uses scare tactics, then consumers fall for the fear and believe that…


Are you saying the two sides are…
?
Fun, sure, but not an experiment that would actually be meaningful.
The data from your phone’s microphone doesn’t magically appear in Google’s advertising servers. It would have to go through a lot of steps before it gets there, and one of the first steps is in your home (if you’re on WiFi). One can analyze the traffic/data that leaves their phone.
It’s good to be cautious, but worrying about your phone’s microphone is potentially like worrying about your windows while leaving your front door open.
Yet again, someone mistakes an anecdote for evidence. And evidence is also not the plural form of anecdote.
I’m sure we have people here who are tech-savvy enough to have actually examined the kinds of data that their phone is sharing.
If you have something like Google Home or Amazon Alexa, then yeah, those would be sending voice data back, and yeah, they could probably use it for advertising. But as far as I know, there is no evidence that phones are “always listening” and “always sending information back” when they’re idle.


I agree on the point of security theatre. I think the tracking stuff provides more actual useful information, but I also imagine it’s more for reactionary investigations rather than pre-emptive protections.
I could be wrong, though.


I’d call it both. Hassling people for taking sunscreen or water onboard is probably mostly theatre. All of the tracking and scanning is probably what they actually use to find any naughty people.
This is why I ride on sidewalks! Lol
(I move slowly and yield to pedestrians)