Interesting, so it seems to depend on how accessible the manufacturer makes their camera api?
Does that make sense? I don’t know much about how this all works, to be honest
Hi, I’m Miss Brainfart.
I’m afraid of sharks, with the exception being blåhaj. What could that possibly mean, huh.
(That’s not a hint, I genuinely have no idea)
Lemmings can also find me @miss_brainfart:catgirl.cloud on Matrix, if they desire to do so for e2ee reasons
Interesting, so it seems to depend on how accessible the manufacturer makes their camera api?
Does that make sense? I don’t know much about how this all works, to be honest
Oh, that sounds annoying. If it’s any consolation, there’s clip-on macro lenses for closer focus that can be had for just a few bucks.
Speaking from experience, you can produce some really cool shots with those, if there isn’t any other solution for that problem.
Ohhh, okay. Gotta say, wouldn’t have surprised me though.
auto-focus on the macro lens just doesn’t work (making that one useless)
So you basically have a fixed focus distance, or is it all over the place because the auto-focus freaks out?
Oh wow, so it’s even worse than I thought. It works on my one+ 5t, but maybe because I’m running DivestOS? Or one+ has just closed down the camera api on newer models
Yeah, the only alternative I know of would be Gcam with unnecessary permissions removed.
Other than that, the LineageOS default cam can use all the lenses, but doesn’t have any useful manual settings.
OpenCamera is pretty damn good, offering pretty much all the manual settings you could want.
There is only one downside to it:
As far as I know, it can only use the phones (back and front) main camera lens. So if your phone has extra lenses for tele, night mode or whatever, OpenCamera can’t do anything with them.
At least from my experience.
If they transparently inform buyers about the account requirement and what that means, then they have done their duty and are compliant, I’d say.
Not that I like that.
But as long as the consumer knows everything they need to know to make an informed decision about the product they’re going to use, it’s all good.
Now, this decision also needs to be voluntary, so if there are some dark patterns or other carefully constructed circumstances bullying the consumer into accepting all the bs, then that would violate the GDPR.
But what is voluntary or not is hard to say, for many products and services. Can be argued either way, and you better believe it will be argued either way.
On that note, I wish Firefox had a setting to always load sites in reader mode, when available. Ideally with the ability to set exceptions, though.
Not everyone can do everything at once, and doing something is better than doing nothing at all.
Guess the fines need to climb exponetially, then
Well damn, this is great. Too many private email providers still do their own thing in terms of encryption, so that is awesome to hear
DivestOS can also deny internet access, for the people who don’t have a Pixel
One of the big organs of the EU deliberately breaking EU law. Always cool when that happens.
Although, they’ve proven themselves to be so incompetent, I wouldn’t be surprised if they didn’t actually know EU law.
But bridges are still a thing? Okay, Apple. Sure.
Phone numbers harm anonymity, not privacy.
I mean, it was kinda expected and inevitable that one big service was going to reign supreme. Lots of things make push notification a real hassle, like you describe. Speaking for Android as I don’t know much about iOS, Firebase works incredibly well, it’s a super elegant solution, and if Google wasn’t such a shitshow, I’d love it.
But it is a shitshow, in so many ways. So some services encrypt the contents, some don’t send them over those servers in the first place, but the remaining metadata is still shockingly useful for surveillance purposes.
I don’t really know where I’m going with this comment, but as an EU resident, I’d just like to see alternative systems getting more attention.
Idk, it’s just that so many people hear news like this and go: „It is what it is, can’t change it“
Well not with that attitude, that’s for sure
I don’t think I can really fault any Android developer for wanting to use Firebase and be done with it, because it’s just so simple to implement, and generally easy to work with.
But some things should be more important than comfort, shouldn’t they.
I use DivestOS, so Google Play Services and all that comes along with it isn’t there in the first place
UnifiedPush needs all the support we can give it
Does Connect You work for you? I can send messages, but if someone replies, the notification only shows their number instead of the name I saved them as, and the reply doesn’t show up in the chat itself