This drug does the opposite. It reduces appetites so people eat less.

So much tech support has moved to Discord. That’s worth keeping around.

Would you like to elaborate for those of us who don’t know anything about the guy?

This triggered my shitpost Spidey senses. But what do I know. I never studied in the US.

Whenever I see the term “consciousness” in a paper, it automatically gets flagged in my head as non-serious. But I work in AI, so maybe that shouldn’t apply to whatever your field is. That brings me to the next problem: I can’t figure out what your field is supposed to be from this paper. It’s lacking the background and prior work sections that would serve to position your work into the greater context of existing work.

Do you use this for physical machines too?

Calories are expensive, and I’m not made of money.

For me, it’s a matter of restoring the convenience and UX that you’ve given up by leaving the big providers.

And where do the laws of logic come from if not from the laws of physics and the way our brains perceive and process them?

Truth teller: “He’ll point you towards the door that leads to certain death”

Isn’t most of their incomes from sponsorship? What YouTube offers is a large audience that makes sponsorship valuable to advertisers.

It also helps that the current generation of image generation models essentially work by “deblurring” some random noise. Having a blur in the resulting image just means the model has to do less work in a sense.

How many bits is a /s mask?

This makes way more sense than active suppression. If you don’t have an understanding of the context, then you can’t compress the memory. Every sound/sensation/image is unique and had to be remembered as a unique experience.

I’m saying that it makes no difference even if everyone did it. Denoising is trivial.

The noise you add won’t even register. No two people are going to half-ass it the same way, so if you average everyone’s responses, the correct answer comes out.

These lakes are formed when the cloud is saturated and gives us data precipitation.

Better that they tell us imo. If someone thinks that the people I care about don’t deserve to exist for reasons no one can control, I’d rather know and avoid giving them money than to help them quietly gain influence and power until they can eradicate these people themselves.

It’s a bit of a circular problem. Certain journals have a reputation of publishing higher quality work, so if you see where it’s published, you’re more likely to read it. Since it draws in readers, it leads to more citations. More citations means more people want to publish there, meaning that the journal gets to be more selective and gets to choose the cream of the crop. Thus maintaining their reputation of publishing higher quality work.

arXiv is standard in cs. We use this on conjunction with peer reviewed venues (also all free and volunteer run) and it’s been working out decently well for us. Other fields need to follow suit.