fxomt

Sounds good, thanks for the info :)

Right, but how does that make it better than matrix? it is also an open protocol, and most spaces that i use are on matrix anyway.

attempted to be EEEed is a good sign i guess, since it implies it’s a threat to meta and google though.

Interesting, and I didn’t know matrix itself into that much short (though they always had a lifeless corpo feeling…)

I’ve always wanted to create an account but never was able to figure out how (for my chosen servers at least) but know i want to try again. thanks for the info :)

I’ve always been curious with the differences between XMPP and matrix but i can’t ever find anything explaining it. Why is it in your opinion better?

Platforms that pretend to champion free speech but in reality are nazi bars. (think Xitter, truthsocial, rumble, kick, stuff like that)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-tech

Here’s a great video on it (at least if i remember): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ca8zM3WyVw

… Besides ML, I should have specified 😂

There are some cool users over there tho :/ gonna miss them

jfc, even his wallpaper??? lmao. thanks for sharing this, got a crack out of me

I am disturbed that we are trying to consolidate all conversations to a community that does not allow all conversations.

privacy@dbzer0 is just another community, if you don’t like it there’s 4 more privacy communities to choose from, that’s the magic of the fediverse :)

I’m not trying to consolidate all conversations to privacy@dbzer0, it’s supposed to be a community that solves the problems in the original fedigrow thread. If you don’t believe that they’re problems, then you are more than free to keep using !privacy@lemmy.world, !privacy@lemmy.ca. They’re all great :)

The community itself is hosted on to dbzer0, so i kind of am (the rules of the community, you can praise monero outside the instances’ communities).

Crypto is banned on the instance in general, i have my own reasons for disliking it but if you get Db0’s approval i have no issue and will remove it. He created the rule, surely he has the reasons.

It’s harmful for the environment and [most] of them are public (excluding monero but the first point stands), i assume that’s Db0’s reasons.

Moving all of the privacy discussion to a place where the privacy discussion is limited to a subset of things that are private. It’s probably not good for the privacy community

Perhaps, but i’m bound by the instances rules.

Hi, it’s against dbzer0’s rules.

There are less harmful and private ways to pay, too. Such as sending physical money directly to the service (like Mullvad) or if the service doesn’t accept it, something like GNU Taler.

Services that accept crypto are allowed but as db0 said, promoting crypto is banned. (you won’t get banned, just removed)

PS: Crypto is not private at all, the ledgers are public. Only Monero is.

The only time the swiss aren’t neutral, and it’s this lmao

https://nitter.poast.org/andyyen/status/1864436449942110660#m

they doubled down on mastodon (the official account too) but now it’s deleted. Here’s their comment on reddit: https://archive.ph/quYyb