not the country or the triangle :)
In the end, we asked “When you think about chemistry or listen to words like ‘chemistry’ or ‘chemicals’, is usually a good or a bad thought?”, and 87,3% of the respondents answered “Good”.
NGL I feel like this could be taken a number of ways. IDK if that was the intent of the paper or just a side effect of poor wording. Personally I think “bad thoughts” because I’m in a chemistry class but I also like the idea of chemistry so I don’t know what I’d put.
Interesting. And so what does the author mean by “event” then? Just literally anything happening? Does their “law” track with events happening?
First half felt like something you cram into your college essay to fill up the word minimum. I think the lemmy article summarizer also got confused by it.
In my recent research, published in AIP Advances, I used information theory to propose a new law of physics, which I call the second law of infodynamics. And importantly, it appears to support the simulated universe theory.
At the heart of the second law of infodynamics is the concept of entropy—a measure of disorder, which always rises over time in an isolated system. When a hot cup of coffee is left on the table, after a while it will achieve equilibrium, having the same temperature with the environment. The entropy of the system is at maximum at this point, and its energy is minimum.
The second law of infodynamics states that the “information entropy” (the average amount of information conveyed by an event), must remain constant or decrease over time—up to a minimum value at equilibrium.
Okay maybe I’m just not smart enough to get this, and I think that’s probably the case, but isn’t this more in the realm of social science? Is information quantifiable in physics? I know you can quantify data, but information?
I’m not doubting it but I’m just… confused. I don’t feel like article really explained what “information” means in this instance. They said “genetic information,” but that’s also not measured by the term information. I just need like a really dumbed down guide for this…
Also this article just feels like an ad for the author’s study :/
Interesting, most I buy or see in stores are just regular containers
I wonder if there’s been any research on introducing child-safe locks to household chemicals like we have on laundry detergent and on medications…
I remember I did that the first day I got a switch, just to see what the hype was all about. Tasted pretty damn awful but I think if you were really committed to it and drank a lot of water you could probably swallow one.
Seems possible enough to me, considering what they’ve done with pretty much everything else
Important to note for any readers that the suit by the US government is related to digital advertising. they’re not alleging monopolization when it comes to search engines.
Baidu means “100 times” in Chinese and originates from a classic Chinese love poem…
deleted by creator
This my advice too. Just make a burner and chat through there.
If there weren’t a housing crisis then I’d say fuck em, but it’s hard enough finding roommates as is.
Is your father Hank Hill???
deleted by creator
Orwellian is when company does thing I don’t like
Some of the tones felt like they were following the bassline in my opinion
if history has taught us anything, we should not let any elderly british men near this
Considering the pliosaur was alive from ~200 Ma to 66 Ma, 150 Ma is one hell of an approximation lol