Wouldn’t be surprised, but my view of this is definitely not subjective. I have worked in a male dominated field for the last almost 20 years. I also have ADHD with the attendant RSD so working with anybody makes me feel my mistakes more than what is probably healthy or normal.
Depends on if Waymo allowed teens (who can sign up for their own accounts and can have debit cards) to sign up without parental consent. If a parent or guardian ordered the Waymo for them? Probably an agreement for that.
Otherwise though, it’s just as likely they entered into no such agreement.
Of course, they also didn’t agree with allow their children to be trapped in the Waymo against their will. Show me that fine print in any ride share service’s TOS/EULA etc. I would love to see it.
Schools aren’t because parents give them a right to care for the children involved. It doesn’t work that way in a waymo. You can be prevented from leaving a school because from a specific time to a specific time your parents have agreed you will be on the premesis in the care of the faculty.
Doubtful. The only Windows computer I have is the work laptop and they’re unlikely to be worried about making corps verify their ages.
On troop’s personal phones, or on government issued equipment?
This was in response to the article which states that the cameras are license plate readers and conveniently omits that they can and have been used to track people on foot.
Didn’t the Flock CEO just admit (seemingly by mistake) that’s these cameras aren’t just license plate readers?
GOS came out with a statement detailing the continuation of Pixel support.
https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/114670995130379882
https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices
They say it’s harder and harder to get AOSP and the Pixel 11 series have an upgraded ‘more secure’ proprietary chip set so they are unsure how long they will be able to continue support.
The 10 pro still has graphene support. It’ll be on sale here in a little while because the pro 11 is launching (same with their other variants, I think). Unless we get a for sure launch date for the graphene moto phones, I’d pull the trigger on a new pixel.
Good luck with that. I want the opposite of immortality and a long life.
Yeah, I can see a use for smart glasses. Specifically in assisting the hard of hearing, those with partial blindness, maybe even people with other disabilities as well. But the upload of data and cameras recording people without their knowledge and consent is a problem. Not just a problem, but the problem.
But also our laws have a habit of not catching up to the reality of how people use tech to violate the rights of others and that really needs to be addressed. Not against consumers but against tech firms and manufacturers.
They have a point though. Technically from what I’ve read just living near an airport would give ICE the authority to search your phone and anything else you might be carrying if it’s within a certain mile radius. Even if you aren’t using the port of entry (airport for instance). Regardless of whether or not they have any other form of probable cause.
I don’t understand how others don’t understand that. Because it’s a hell of a conclusion to come to.
Again, I was not talking about police. Not even talking about like… The National Guard.
I am suddenly reminded of The Longest Yard movie where they gave the guards a bunch of estrogen.
That’s not really how it works in the military. They don’t just let you shoot things indiscriminately like they do in the police force.
I assumed by fourth year of the car you meant model year not that the car was 4 years old.
First and foremost, Ford had their first real attempt at an EV back in 2011/2012 with the Ford Focus Electric.
Secondly, you seem to have read my original comment as “don’t buy the first two years” when that’s not what I said. Your 4th model yearc car very much falls into the window of my original comment.
Third, your comment made it sound like there weren’t forums full of Mach E owners dragging their balls over Ford’s name to force them to do recalls on the thing.
All I did was point out why I wouldn’t recommend you buy a brand new vehicle line from the car manufacturer with the most recalls of any of its peers.
You decided to take that as a slight instead of the tongue in cheek ribbing it was and now we are here.
I do know more about that vehicle line than you do but that’s neither here nor there. You can stay mad if you’d like, but I’m out.
Nah. The non-GT models were also affected.
And in this case it doesn’t matter if you bought a fourth year Mach E when you’re buying from an automotive company with the most recalls in the industry year over year for like the last 5-6 years running.
https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2023/RCMN-23V687-5094.pdf
The Mach E has had so many recalls. Axle half shafts causing a clicking while turning, differential pinion shafts that shear off or fracture, a whole litany of infotainment issues, botched updates. I seem to recall something about windshield wiper motors, and a problem with some of the glass by the D pillar.
I don’t understand what legal grounds they have to seize the phones. Just installing a different rom shouldn’t be enough.