There are hellish things such as guix for that.
Or ideally the software needs to be upgraded.
There are hellish things such as guix for that.
Or ideally the software needs to be upgraded.
The punishment will be less big than the profit, they won’t stop, as usual.
lol funny
And where then? It is about changing a part of the software, that fits quite clearly an issue/pull request
Well on the contrary you should understand it more. A gendered pronoun carries an idea of gender, and having a genderless pronoun frees the sentence of this gender assumption. Nothing very hard to understand.
Cancel culture, this far-right myth that fascists love so much. You forgot to continue and talk about freedom of speech and how you are a centrist.
Refusing the change is pushing a political agenda too. But I guess it helps seeing which agenda you prefer ;)
It’s the one with a dev that thinks that replacing “he” by “they” is political propaganda?
Yeah, no thanks.
Isn’t the whole point of those to take private information, cross-reference it with other stolen private data and give you results based on that? Doesn’t seem so compatible with privacy.
“Don’t put politics in x” is one of the favourite ideas of “enlightened centrist”.
Also called pieces of shit.
So it will be FOSS! Right?
Right?
Publicly available does not mean free to use.
“I am not ignorant”
That would have been the less insulting explanation.
The amount of ignorance in this comment is impressive.
Brave is notoriously dubious at best, encouraging ads and cryptocurrencies. It doesn’t have any advantages over a hardened Firefox (and I would say even a basic one), so using it doesn’t really make sense.
Encryption is generally “open source” and that’s what makes is strong. Security does not come from people not knowing how things work, but by having properly designed things that work whether people know how they work or not.
And even in the draconic universe, the one constant about humans remained: boomers and their shitty idea of what a wife is.
Github is a private company and as such unfit to protect open source.
What is needed is an autonomous, government funded organisation that will allow the world to get rid of companies making money off the FOSS ecosystem.