Just in time for all the searchable information to be completely drowned out by low quality AI content.
Just in time for all the searchable information to be completely drowned out by low quality AI content.
I’ve never seen a Satanist on TV telling me to send them all my money, or tell me to hate someone.
I have seen at least dozens of Christian leaders push hate for profit.
I guess I found what I’m reading next, thank you.
Advertising is psychology, and Google is the biggest ad company. What do you expect?
I’d say more than that. I don’t think anyone is that close to AGI…yet
A calculator does most of it too, but this is a LLM that can do lots of other things also, which is a big piece of the “general” part of AGI.
Richard Feynman said “You have to keep a dozen of your favorite problems constantly present in your mind, although by and large they will lay in a dormant state. Every time you hear or read a new trick or a new result, test it against each of your twelve problems to see whether it helps. Every once in a while there will be a hit, and people will say, “How did he do it? He must be a genius!”
We are close to a point where a computer that can hold all the problems in its “head” can test all of them against all of the tricks. I don’t know what math problems that starts to solve but I bet a few of them would be applicable to cryptology.
But then again, I have no idea what I’m talking about and just making bold guesses based on close to no information.
A legit ~50% reduction in the government based on a random metric with no thought given to consequence or if the government would even still function.
One might even call it “arbitrary and capricious.”
If ‘anybody’ does anything similar to tracing, copy&pasting or even sampling a fraction of another person’s imagery or written work, that anybody is violating copyright.
Ok, but tracing is literally a part of the human learning process. If you trace a work and sell it as your own that’s bad. If you trace a work to learn about the style and let that influence your future works that is what every artist already does.
The artistic process isn’t copyrighted, only the final result. The exact same standards can apply to AI generated work as already do to anything human generated.
I take it we don’t use the phrase “good writers borrow, great writers steal” in this day and age…
But you know Nestle wouldn’t. To them child slavery is like steroids on steroids.
Without legislation forcing it, why would they bother? They already have enough separation from the crimes to avoid legal repercussions, and they get to sell data with the “this will be used for profitable criminal activity” premium baked into the original sale price.
It’s like expecting Nestle to take any steroids action (weird auto-correct) to prevent child slavery. Why are they going to stir the pot and screw up the nice thing they have going?
So…their takeaway was that the value of the data is worth the awful publicity?