

You’re the one that mentioned about Garuda not being privacy focused though? I don’t really get why you wouldn’t just answer the question if you were responding anyway?
IT Consultant by day, gamer by night 🎮
MTF trans 🏳️⚧️ | Sydney based | 420 🌿
Matrix: @keshara:chat.blahaj.zone
Sharkey: @keshara@blahaj.zone
Pixelfed: keshara@pix.blahaj.zone
Currently spending way too much time in World of Warcraft, Counter Strike 2, and absolutely obsessed with Sea of Stars.
Always down to connect with fellow gamers and fediverse wanderers 👋


You’re the one that mentioned about Garuda not being privacy focused though? I don’t really get why you wouldn’t just answer the question if you were responding anyway?


Outside of something like TailsOS, what Linux distros are you regarding as “privacy focused”?


So because you don’t know about it, “it’s straight up unknown”?


It’s not an unknown browser? Firedragon was the default browser in Garuda Linux (not 100% sure if it still is), Garuda if you didn’t know is quite a popular Linux distribution that has attracted a bit of attention over the years mostly for its OOTB theming.
I’m not “getting up in arms” about it, but rather trying to understand a very confident double down on their comment in a public forum.
The advice to not touch something “unvetted”, the fact they so confidently said it was “straight up unknown”. Just because you haven’t heard of something does not mean you can now confidently start telling people that it is unknown, don’t touch it, etc. This isn’t Reddit…