Infiltrated_ad8271

For whatever reason, they are not visible from kbin.

After they post-retire your enemies, they will send you the confirmation images censored with GIMP.

They have no problem in the xorg vs wayland war, they arbitrarily reject both.

Unfortunately doing so anonymously is not an option for many countries.

https://idm.net.au/blog/002646two-years-european-isp%E2%80%99s-data

Okay, now I see which article you are referring to.
I know knowledge-zero, but we have different points, mine was not about the inability to do it but how the government will do it.

It would be very easy for them to justify that they have to identify pedos, I would be very surprised if they would guarantee privacy. But whatever, unfortunately I guess we’ll find out.

I read the article and did not see where the method is specified, have you even read it?

When implemented correctly

Aha. How bold to assume that they will limit themselves and apply privacy best practices.

But that refers to personal data, and I suppose the state will be able to identify you and your habits if it gets the logs from the websites.
I wonder if the websites will get a unique identifier, that would allow them to track you so accurately it would make google horny.

Expect parents to be minimally responsible? No way!

Receive it in an ad and keep it on your disk as a cache?

Firefox’s cookie management is absolutely terrible and anachronistic, forget about automated granular control. It also has serious bugs like this one, it’s better to use containers for any site where you want a whitelist.

There are some addons to help you manage it, but I think they are all flawed or broken.

Time to delete my account, before it is considered “suspicious” and I can’t even log in without verification.

More than posting their own channels or doing it on an anti-privacy website, I am annoyed by the medium itself. Even if it’s a topic of interest, videos can become really tedious depending on the author with no practical way to get around it, plus very little accessibility; it’s always more convenient in text.

The Tor project themselves reccomend against using their service with a VPN

The devs say it as general advice for those who don’t know what they are doing.. It’s perfectly fine as long as you don’t try to set up strange configurations and you can trust your vpn provider.

You have already read the whole argumentation of the anti_tor+vpn fanatics (yep, they exist): The tor devs don’t recommend it.
What they will never tell you is that the devs say it as general advice for those who don’t know what they are doing.

The (real) points against it can be summed up in two, that certain unusual configurations (that you would never apply accidentally or as a newbie) are insecure, and that vpn providers might not be reliable.

That’s very easy to catch. You stand out much, much more as a spoofing firefox user than as a firefox user.

I’ve been browsing valetudo, I was a bit surprised that almost all installations are rated to some degree “easy”, even though many devices require things that are not at all accessible such as assembling and soldering your circuit board; I don’t want to know what a device rated as difficult would be like.

That’s a high level of shitposting, but very low on trolling. Congratulations, you are my first blocked user!

It doesn’t matter since none is needed for this. I understand that the goal is to add filler with intimidating legalese, but I doubt that customer “support” is going to react as they expect.