I’d guess it’s harmful to about half of the population, though some are fine with that
he/him
Nerd, programmer, writer. I like making things!
I’d guess it’s harmful to about half of the population, though some are fine with that
They’re referring to the other CBT acronym
I didn’t know they were planning to pivot to an open source client, neat! Especially if peppy would like to do something else, the community is massive and can help carry the work
I played this last year, loved it! Nice review and the sequel is also excellent
This is so cool! I’ve seen a few of these writerdecks lately and love the trend, especially with the planck layout
Four, it’s practically a one man band! Wasn’t it was out for half a year? I can’t imagine trying to patch something 15 billion miles away
That cloning scandal was crazy! If anyone wants a decent doc series with fancy editing:
This happened in January, but:
King under the Mountain was picked up by a unnamed publisher, who helped finance a big upgrade to the game. 9 months into expanding the game — the publisher backed out. Why? As the developer said “They were worried that a number of similar games that have released in the time between would cause it to struggle to stand out.”.
Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling
A bit of cynicism is always healthy!
Luckily you can check out the author’s bio right from the article:
Dr. Don Lincoln is a Senior Scientist at Fermilab, America’s leading particle physics laboratory, who has coauthored over 1,500 scientific papers. He was a member of the teams that discovered the top quark in 1995 and the Higgs boson in 2012.
Harvard has been partnering with their research labs for the last decade to gain access to hardware and algos they wouldn’t have themselves
Fortunately the people working on brain research aren’t the same people programming assistant
Yes! That this thing could evolve into existence is practically a miracle
ML is pretty common when working with a ton of data, from another article:
To make a map this finely detailed, the team had to cut the tissue sample into 5,000 slices and scan them with a high-speed electron microscope. Then they used a machine-learning model to help electronically stitch the slices back together and label the features. The raw data set alone took up 1.4 petabytes. “It’s probably the most computer-intensive work in all of neuroscience,” says Michael Hawrylycz, a computational neuroscientist at the Allen Institute for Brain Science, who was not involved in the research. “There is a Herculean amount of work involved.”
Unfortunately techbros have poisoned the term AI 🥲
Source: Google helped make an exquisitely detailed map of a tiny piece of the human brain
Doesn’t help that I don’t see any writer or editor credits.
Imagine how awesome any creative field could be
This is going to go well!
Edit: over 50 downvotes lol https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/399619/our-partnership-with-openai
Yes, that’s what the post is about. The comment you replied to appears to be a tongue-in-cheek reference to the other use of the term, which can be found on urban dictionary