It shouldn’t be a difference, what Ublock and Brave and network based blockers such Pihole do is they have a list of domains that are not allowed to load on your system.

If they find that www(dot)adexample(dot)com is trying to load in your browser, they simply block it and the video continue.

Maybe the only different is the privacy itself that offer something like Libretube vs something like YouTube + Ublock. While using Libretube, you are only loading what is neccesary, you are not giving Google more information that you shouldn’t, and while you using YouTube in Firefox for example you are loading all the cookies, trackers and that stuff, even in private browser with maximum privacy settings and adblocker.

Front-ends circumvent YouTube’s algorithmic recommendations.

And that’s huge. I find the algo to be addictive and toxic. Even if you’re behind nested Tor relays or whatever, and YouTube can’t track you in any way, it deprives YT of the opportunity to short circuit your brain, and keep you scrolling.

But in reality, browser extensions are imperfect, and browser YouTube is still getting tons of information on what parts of videos you watch, maybe where you stop scrolling or pause your mouse, what resolution you stream, whatvideo you choose next and so on. Even with obfuscation, and an ephemeral profile, I bet it’s enough to fingerprint you.

If you want to circumvent this, try a browser that goes hardcore with anti fingerprinting specifically, like Cromite. These go out of the way to fake anything identifying, like (for example) returning fake core counts, screen resolutions and such. Then load that up with UBlock and more YT extensions.

IMO the only real difference is using Invidious

deleted by creator