Anybody know about this search engine ?
How it can be compared with duckduckgo, qwant, swisscows, metager, startpage, etc…
It is opensource , free & private according to alternativeto.net
What do you think ?
Anybody know about this search engine ?
How it can be compared with duckduckgo, qwant, swisscows, metager, startpage, etc…
It is opensource , free & private according to alternativeto.net
What do you think ?
If it’s free, someone pays the bill and you’re probably the product.
I agree for most of the part, but what about FLOSS softwares and services ? I dont think the search engine i showed is proprietary.
A lot of open source software is made by enthusiasts for free. A lot more of it is made by companies like Microsoft or Google for various reasons - I believe mostly to claim “we’re open source”, but also to entice others to contribute more code that they can leverage for free, which is a valid reason too. One thing is sure: they do pay their engineers’ salaries
Free services however… That’s different: we all know why Microsoft or Google propose free services.
Now this unknown search engine you linked to: they could be funded by idealists who want to promote privacy, like the Calyx institute for example. However, looking at their website, I see no obvious reason why they propose the service they propose: they do have a Donate button that leads to a page with 4 payment links - 3 of which crypto - and their About Us button leads to a page that just says “test”. Kinda sketchy…
Therefore, I assume it’s up to no good, because that’s the reasonable thing to assume with any unknown website that looks sketchy.
Yeah. I understands your points. Thank you for taking a look into the search engine as you can.
Currently there is every search engine is just proprietary including duckduckgo, brave, esosia, startpage, etc… That’s why am looking for a new one.
Open-source isn’t a guarantee that whoever makes the open-source software is privacy-respecting. Android was made by Google for example, and it was made open-source for the express purpose of creating a mobile OS ecosystem that would become so dominant it would allow Google to collect data on as many people as possible. Google invested massive amounts of money developing an entire operating system for a reason: they didn’t do it out of kindness.
Conversely, closed source isn’t a guarantee that whoever makes the software is up to no good. There’s plenty of closed source software out there that’s perfectly legit. But of course it’s harder to verify the code if you have doubts.
Being FOSS is not enough for trust by itself, but it is a necessary factor.
when it comes to server-side software, FOSS is of little importance unless you are self hosting. there is zero way for you to verify, unlike client software.