For several years I’ve been using DuckDuckGo instead of Google Search, and I’ve been overall quite happy with the results. Only rarely had I to resort to Google search (!g).

During the last month or two, however, I’ve found myself using the !g switch and Google search more than half of the time. DuckDuckGo shows no or few results where Google shows more (and useful) ones.

Still I don’t want to give in. So:

  • Have you also experienced this worsening of DuckDuckGo?
  • Which other more privacy-respecting alternatives do you recommend?
  • radamant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve tried other search engines any times. Despite the worsening google search somehow is still much better than alternatives.

    • diffusive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Crawling is not really the elephant in the room, really. The issue is ranking and I don’t see how they plan to address that for having good quality

  • BananaOnionJuice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think in the last few years DDG has been improving and google has been worsening for general searching. Because I have nearly stopped using !g before I used it constantly.

    I still use google at work as the results there match a bit better.

  • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I use DDG and can’t say I’ve had an uptick in the amount of !g I have to do. The only one recently was for an image search but that’s pretty normal when looking for something obscure.

    Don’t have any solutions, but figured another input might be interesting.

    • stravanasu@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s very likely to depend on the kinds of searches I do, indeed. Although I think it’s the same as in the previous years. Could also be just a subjective impression, so I’ll try to keep count of how often the “!g” really leads to better results.

  • haverholm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve definitely felt the enshittification of DDG. A couple of years ago they would start dropping hits related to my location into my search results, even when I had region off and private search by default. That gave me the impression that my IP address was being used and possibly passed on to Bing, but I don’t have the chops to confirm it 🤷

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Duckduckgo gives you Bing results. If you like Microsoft they are up the alley. If not tough luck.

    DDG is often but not always a lot worse than Google in my experience.

  • ZeroCool@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I haven’t experienced any issues with search results with DDG. But if you feel it’s a problem, you could try a metasearch engine like SearXNG. You can self-host it or use one of the many public instances maintained by the community. The main advantage with it is that you can pull results from multiple search engines with a single query. It’s highly customizable too. You can configure it exactly how you want.

      • kixik@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve only used searx[ng] for several years. searx.space is pretty recommended to look for searxng working instances, as well as the ones that you might prefer depending of the country of the instance and so for. Public searx but no searxng working instances are really uncommon now a days.

        Every now and then your preferred instance becomes useless (whether google finds its way to block it, or to apply an aggressive rate limiter, or the instance gets unmaintained), so one needs to look for another one.

        DDG doesn’t give bad results, but when I realized the majority of its results come from bing, meaning it’s mostly a metasearch as well with a few entries of its own (that might have varied from that time), I then started to only use searx, and then when searx working instances were really hard to find I moved to searxng, and I’m happy with those instances. Again, at times I need to move to a different instance, though I’ve been using the last one I chose for more than a year now…

        • sbird [moved to sopuli]@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          For me at least, searxng.world works. I just went to searx.space, opened loads of them in a list, and left the ones that weren’t blocked in my country. (the only ones left were searxng.world and two really specific local ones with alphabet soup names)

    • adry@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Public instances need to fight against the giants, but running your own local version is easy if you learn to use Docker. It just takes around a hundred of megabytes of memory. I have been super happy with it.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      And for anyone who doesn’t know: SearX is pronounced “Search”, and it’s successor, SearXNG, is pronounced “Searching”.

      (In many languages “x” signals a “ch” sound)

      Note: But maybe don’t go around saying “Have you Searching’d it yet?”

    • lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Tried using public instances, but 1/3 searches was failing. Found it unusable. That was like a year ago when I was looking for DDG alternatives.

      • ZeroCool@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve had good luck with searxng.site, but yeah, public instances aren’t going to have the uptime and reliability of Google or DDG. Think of public instances as a test drive. You get a vibe for it but it’s a much better ride when you self-host.

  • Commiunism@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Searx is good enough if you set up plenty of engines - I do look up quite a lot of stuff and not once in the past 3 months did I go “yeah I need to use google for this”.

    • stravanasu@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m trying SearX today, after so many recommended it. It looks promising! Thank you for pointing out the multiple-engines setup.

      One possible drawback: it seems I can’t do “verbatim” searches; or at least, quotation marks don’t seem to lead to verbatim searches – I’ll try with “+”. DDG was adamant with quotation marks, that’s something I liked a lot about it.

      • Commiunism@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Interesting, verbatim searches work perfectly for me. Maybe it’s some search engine that doesn’t support them? I personally have bing/google/duckduckgo selected.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      This.

      DDG often sucks, but the aggregation evens that out. Plus you can use google without giving them anything. My instance runs via VPN e.g.

    • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I use it all the time, just wish they had an image search tab. That’s the only thing I switch search engines for now.