• phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which one? Because in today’s world nearly all games are supported unsupported games are exceedingly rare

    • Estebiu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Send a letter to the game developers, and if they don’t plan on supporting linux, don’t play it. Simple as that.

        • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah proton still has a lot of limitations and workarounds to get many games working, so if you just want true plug-n-play you’re not going to be satisfied with that solution.

          • Dr. Bluefall@toast.ooo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, but I’d still argue that it’s a lot better than nothing, and we have Valve to thank for making a lot of Windows games actually playable on Linux.

            • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Of course it’s better than nothing, at its definitely working OK, but gaming on Linux is still not quite good enough in terms of user experience. Average users don’t want to, and honestly they shouldn’t, debug just to play their game…

        • ddkman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am actually not sure this is correct. Voicing your opinion about wantong native support is a much better direction than trying to run a more and more accurate windows emulator.