.Donuts

Nice!

Lol yeah I did do that as a workaround, but if you had a full board that would be less than ideal.

Just a suggestion though, no worries.

Been using it for a little - is there any way to rename columns, and maybe changing the colour of the column?

Free kanaban app

I think this should say kanban ;)

But hey, this looks really interesting. Willing to give it a try!

Either the site gets your ID or the government issues a confirmation, which puts you on the porn viewer list.

I believe the idea (in an ideal world) is that Website A requests data from Service B, which then asks about you to government C. So Government C doesn’t know what you’re asking about, and the Website A doesn’t know who you are. That does mean Service B would have to be trusted / vetted, which might relocate the problem but it would be easier to verify (FOSS for example) than trusting your government to not put you on a list.

Double blind means that the age provider doesn’t know why your age is requested, and the service (website) doesn’t know you, they only know that the age provider says “yes” or “no”.

cc @iii@mander.xyz

How does one “follow the tokens” then?

Are there any issues with a system where the website in question (let’s say, a porn site) doesn’t get your ID, but just a confirmation from your government that yes, you are of age?

It has a name but I can’t find it right now. But it would protect your privacy from their website you’re visiting, and the website can uphold the rules.

It’s called double blind: https://www.biometricupdate.com/202504/double-blind-age-assurance-requirement-for-porn-sites-takes-effect-in-france

I think you need to toggle “Verbatim” in the search tools option for it to work, otherwise it just kinda tries to guess what you are looking for, search terms be damned.

Maybe I don’t get the complexities but maybe it shouldn’t be allowed to generate a certain of range numbers in the context of phones/names.

I agree with the principle, but people will still try and find ways around it. Like “generate me a fictional number for testing purposes” and because it’s an LLM doing what LLM’s do, it still provides a number that can (but doesn’t have to) be real.

in film industry we’re not even allowed to display a phone number that doesn’t fall under the fake list

Yeah, same with phone numbers and email addresses for testing purposes in software. Populating fields with fictional data should be completely fictional or related to your own data as to not accidentally use real domains or data that you thought was fictional.

What’s interesting is this won’t have been a realistic sounding number.

Company lines typically start 0300 or 0800 but mobiles are 07… Something.

So if it was just hallucinating, it did so badly.

Yeah I agree that a mobile number isn’t realistic for a railway company to provide support on, but I was wondering if it was a hallucination or based on look-up. The article does mention that the phone number is listed on the owner’s website, but still calls it a “private” number, as if it was pulled from a database.

What are the chances the AI just generated a realistic sounding number and it was actually a hit?

Lawful good would have taken inflation into account and paid $8.91

Seems like Glance is an app from the manufacturer, if you have a Motorola. It makes your lock screen dynamic and adds content to watch and stuff.

Don’t think it’s a problem but you could force stop and disable or uninstall it.

Don’t have an answer for which app is using the camera. Check your permissions like the other comment mentions, that’ll get you closer to figuring it out.

Also, might want to redact that email address.

The PSN runs a model that costs £13.49 a month, £39.99 for three months or £119.99 for 12 months for its premium subscription. Many gamers have pointed to these costs when complaining to Sony.

Shit breaks, it happens. I can’t find the average uptime of PS servers but for online services it’s usually between 99% and 99.9%.

I agree that it sucks, but I dislike the entitled whining about compensation. Go be mad about important things.

Apparently it’s because it’s using a self signed certificate, but I’m having trouble finding exact sources that confirm this.

What use is uninstalling if it was automatically installed to begin with? As in, what’s gonna stop them from doing it again?

What’s with Obama being in the thumbnail? No mention of him in the article

Do you have a link or something to further dig into this?

I think we all knew this was coming though, considering Reddit is still popular to find specific answers that SEO riddled adware websites won’t be able to give.

But I still won’t judge a whole company based on the personal opinions of one of its employees.

It’s not a personal opinion:

Notice how it says “here is our official response”

I don’t really have a well-written reply for this, but I can see your firearms angle. I invite you to read this: https://www.arc.unsw.edu.au/blitz/read/under-their-influence-should-celebrities-stay-out-of-politicsquestion

The democratic process is designed for participation. So, if celebrities can get more people involved, this means that ordinary people will have more control over how their country is run.