Wanderhome might be good fit as it targets a non-violent style.

You can watch the first minutes of this interview with Travis and Matt.

The short answer seems to be: The decision to use D&D was made months earlier and they were too committed to that already.

I believe little kids don’t need any system. We, the adults, need the helpful structure.

In other words, pick something that inspires you and don’t worry about the kids.

Ok, one tip: Put stuff on the table. Dice, cards, minis, maps, plushies, …

Game report: Yesterday I played my illusion wizard, creatively named Lusion in a one shot. The adventure was simple: Goblins nap a kid, party comes to rescue. Guardian, ranger, sorcerer, and wizard.

Figment is a funny thing to mess around. For example, Lusian conjured a big red sign to mock the ranger’s scouting.

In the initial encounters, the illusionist mostly watched the ranger killing goblins.

He did scare off the goblins in their entrance rooms with a “GRENADE!!” but that was just a non-magical ruse. High deception, performance, etc skills helps with such stuff though.

The boss fight was against two minions, an alchemist, and a healer goblin. The alchemist showed high initiative and doused the party in fire but then Lusion gave him a stern look and told him to drop prone (Command, the Goblin crit-failed his save). The ranger did the final dirty work and the kid was rescued.

Sadly, I didn’t get to use Illusory Object or Charming Push.

This is the full spellbook currently:

Arcane Prepared Spells DC 17, attack +7; 1st illusory object, command, dizzying colors; Cantrips (1st) daze, detect magic, figment, shield, telekinetic projectile, prestidigitation

Wizard Focus Spells DC 17, attack +7, 1 focus point; 1st charming push

I have read stories that D&D in the 70s it was normal to have groups of 10-20 people. There were player roles like “mappers” for drawing the map. There was a “caller” who summarized the player moves for the GM.

You are not alone.

Runehammer has a nice video on Timers with some more examples.

How do you know? Did you actually read the article or what?? 😉

So you’re looking for discussions like: Is Gandalf a wizard, sorcerer, or cleric? Which level are his spells?

Sounds like fun. 😄

You cannot really separate setting and system. For example, the D&D system uses Vancian magic. That isn’t how magic works in Lord of the Rings. So you cannot „see Lotr through the lens of the D&D system“.

Youtube interview of Mercer about the Hope-Fear mechanic.

I had no chance to try it myself.

Compared to Dungeon World, the Hope/Fear counters are a difference.

I’m not sure where they got it from. To me it seems somewhat like Fate points.

What is PbtA? Well, the Baker’s definition:

“Powered by the Apocalypse” isn’t the name of a kind of game, set of game elements, or even the core design thrust of a coherent movement. (Ha! This last, the least so.) Its use in a game’s trade dress signifies ONLY that the game was inspired by Apocalypse World in a way that the designer considers significant, and that it follows our policy wrt others’ use of our creative work.

Is Daggerheart inspired by Apocalypse World? I think so: Meguey Baker co-authored Apocalypse World and the post-apocalyptic “Motherboard” campaign frame in Daggerheart. I would be surprised if Mercer would not have credited PbtA somewhere. If Darrington Press would like to, Meg and Vincent would probably approve with the “PbtA” stamp.

It doesn’t use the “2d6+stat” role mechanic but that is not essential just like all the other game mechanics.

I’m sorry. This is probably not very helpful. Maybe a more precise answer could be given if you ask how it diverges from “Dungeon World” or some other PbtA game you know.

It seems to me like all the Youtubers actually agree: This Daggerheart license is not as bad as OGL but there are some parts which raise concerns.

It isn’t a problem for now but imagine a future where someone big (like Hasbro or Disney or…) buys the rights to Daggerheart and wants to extract more money from the IP. Having experienced WotC, the TTRPG community is sensitive about it, so it seems appropriate to demand some more explanation from Darrington Press.

Symbolic City’s Big, Last Minute Free RPG Day Sale.

Free RPG Day 2025 by StarshineScribbles.

Free Indie RPG Collection BUNDLE on DrivethruRPG

On a scale of 0 (no clue what they are doing) to 10 (there is a master plan with a hundred steps), how strategic is Critical Role?

My guess would be around 3. This is mostly „seems like a cool idea, let’s do it“ without much of a plan.

At EnWorld is a list.

In one word: politics.

More words from here:

Domain-level play is an old term for giving RPG characters political power in the form of ”domains” they control, be those guilds, corporations, or part or all of a sovereign nation. Historically, Dungeons and Dragons campaigns would eventually see the characters having enough wealth and influence to purchase a stronghold, which would give them not only a base of operations but also a parcel of land to see over. Once the characters were officially nobles in this way, a whole new area of storylines could open up, involving courtly intrigue as well as broader politics. At a default level this would insert characters onto a bigger political stage, but it was both possible and for some palatable to start changing the course of politics in the world in which the game took place.