- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
3·2 days agoWhat if we just learned to code and wrote if ourselves and took some personal interest in the lines we produce?
Almost by definition, maintainability doesn’t refer to a “specific part”
https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/blog/artcraft-adobe-clone-ai-code-quality/
I’m not interested in getting into an argument about this any further, look through their github issues, there’s plenty to learn.
As a note, if you think they’re genuinely reviewing this much code at this speed, I think you need to consider the logistics of that.
Also unsustainable: the code they generate.
It’s huge, sprawling and messy.
https://github.com/storytold/photocraft/issues/6903
https://github.com/storytold/artcraft/issues/2273
https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/blog/artcraft-adobe-clone-ai-code-quality/
Exactly. Lots of good stuff written in Rust!
This is almost entirely AI generated by the looks of it.
The code, the readme, the website.
I think also, people forget that open source projects need maintainers who are properly invested.
It’s difficult to imagine a meaningful future for a codebase that you spun up with AI and don’t actually understand yourself.
There’s an expectation of stewardship beyond “yeah I spent 2k on tokens”